Month Archives: April 2009

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Gabele

April 21, 2009

Here’s what we are reading today.

Miss California Says “Yes” to Marriage

by Michael Leaser

April 20, 2009

Last night at the Miss USA pageant in Las Vegas, finalist and eventual first runner-up Carrie Prejean fielded a question on same-sex marriage from judge Perez Hilton, an openly homosexual celebrity blogger. Her response, the crowd’s reaction, and the judge’s expression, are worth hearing and seeing:

 

 

In a follow-up interview with Access Hollywood, Prejean said her answer “cost me my crown. I wouldn’t have had it any other way. I said what I feel. I stated an opinion that was true to myself and that’s all I can do.”

It is a very touchy subject and he is a homosexual and I see where he was coming from and I see the audience would’ve wanted me to be more politically correct,” she added. “But I was raised in a way that you can never compromise your beliefs and your opinions for anything.”

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Gabele

April 20, 2009

Here’s what we are reading today.

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Gabele

April 17, 2009

Here’s what we are reading today.

They Treat Horses, Don’t They?

by David Prentice

April 17, 2009

Recent news from London that adult stem cells will be used to repair damaged tendons and ligaments in patients. This isn’t really a new technique, but the interesting thing is that the technique is now used routinely in horses and other animals. Finally, the realization has hit that this adult stem cell treatment might work for people, too. More than 1,500 race horses have been treated using the same process, and follow-up data suggest a 50 percent reduction in re-injury over a three year period, compared with conventional treatment. Several veterinary companies have pioneered the procedure in animals, including Vet-Stem, and stories routinely circulate of a beloved pet, police dog, or race horse that has been treated successfully using adult stem cells.

The tribal wisdom of the Lakota Indians, passed on from one generation to the next, says that when you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount. Maybe it’s about time people realized they should quit riding the dead embryonic stem cell mount and saddle up to ride a winner with adult stem cells.

Gates Greenlights Iran’s Bomb; Israel/USA Imperiled

by Chris Gacek

April 17, 2009

            Given the great focus on Tax Day and the April 15th Tea Parties held across the nation little attention has been paid to a major story regarding American policy toward Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

            Yesterday Mark Levin, radio talk show host, discussed an article in the Los Angeles Times which gave this description of remarks made Monday by U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates at Quantico, VA:

Reporting from Washington — Amid increasing suggestions that Israel might attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates warned this week that such a strike would have dangerous consequences, and asserted that Tehran’s acquisition of a bomb can be prevented only if ‘Iranians themselves decide it’s too costly.’

Using his strongest language on the subject to date, Gates told a group of Marine Corps students that a strike would probably delay Tehran’s nuclear program from one to three years. A strike, however, would unify Iran, ‘cement their determination to have a nuclear program, and also build into the whole country an undying hatred of whoever hits them,’ he said.”

Well, the cat is definitely out of the bag now, and it is pretty clear that the Obama Administration will take no military action to stop the Iranian weapons program.

            First, Gates’s observation that the acquisition of an Iranian bomb can only be prevented by Iranian action really runs up the white flag while defying reality.  The United States surrounds Iran with air bases in the Gulf States, Iraq, and Afghanistan.  We can also have naval assets in the region on command.  The U.S. has tactical bombing capabilities second to none in the history of warfare, and the Secretary of Defense says that?  Either he thinks he’s running the Meals-on-Wheels program for Arlington, Virginia, or this country has wasted a whole lot of money on planes, ships, and related gizmos.

            Second, contrast Gates’s thinking with that of Israel in 1981 when it bombed Saddam Hussein’s nuclear program out of existence.  Sure, Saddam kept trying, but he never built a bomb: the damage was irreparable.  A successful attack could buy us decades.

            Third, Gates’s psychobabble about Iran living in “undying hatred” of the nation that ends their nuclear program seems completely wrong.  If you were an Iranian what would you prefer — Israel bombing your nuclear program with conventional weapons or Israel retaliating with nuclear weapons after the ayatollahs have flattened Tel Aviv?  Iranians must know that every day their leaders have nuclear weapons would be a day their lives and the continued existence of the Persian civilization would be in grave danger.  Hillary Clinton was correct when she observed that an Iranian nuclear attack would lead to annihilatory retaliation.  Millions of dead.

            Finally, these comments indicate that American cooperation with an Israeli preemptive strike is unlikely.  In fact, it appears the Obama Administration will do all it can to prevent Israeli action.  Instead, the administration is going to try to persuade Iran that the political cost of a weapons program for Iran will exceed its value, and that is an argument the Iranians have already rejected.

March 2009 «

» May 2009

Archives