May 12, 2008

Does R. Kelly believe he can fly?

Jury selection in the high-profile child pornography trial of rapper R. Kelly begins today in Cook County, Illinois. Mr. Kelly has pleaded not guilty to having videotaped himself having sex with a minor. Cook County prosecutors have doggedly pursued this case in order to protect children, arrest the degradation of women and establish community values of decency.

We can only hope and pray that the old comedic line "don't believe your lying eyes" does not prevail.

Ken Blackwell | 11:19 AM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

October 24, 2007

Southwick Confirmed!

After what seems like a battle without end, Judge Leslie Southwick has now been confirmed by the U.S. Senate to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 59-38 vote.

Here is FRC's press release on Judge Southwick's nomination:

FRC Praises Confirmation of Judge Southwick

October 24, 2007 - Wednesday

Washington, D.C. - Tony Perkins, President of Family Research Council, made the following comments following Senate confirmation of Judge Leslie Southwick to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit:

"We are pleased that Judge Leslie Southwick, a veteran of the Iraq war with 11 years of judicial experience, can finally move forward after struggling for a simple up-or-down vote. However, the unconstitutional use of judicial filibusters continues as other well-qualified judicial nominees are vilified and blocked by Senate leadership and their liberal allies. I urge the Senate to end the backlog of judicial nominations and allow a fair up-or-down vote for each nominee.

"I thank President Bush and Senators Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Trent Lott (R-MS), Thad Cochran (R-MS), and Arlen Specter (R-PA) for their hard work to overcome stalling tactics and confirm this highly-qualified nominee to the bench."

Jared Bridges | 1:29 PM | | Comments (3)

October 23, 2007

Straw Poll on the Issues

The FRC Action Values Voter Straw Poll has been making lots of news, but one of the poll questions that hasn't yet gained as much attention was question #3, which asked participants to rank the order of importance among a set of issues. Here are the results:

Please indicate which issue is the most important in determining your opinion of the candidate that you will most likely vote for?

Here's the statistical breakdown:

ISSUE VOTES PERCENTAGE
Abortion 2398 41.52%
Same-sex "Marriage" 1141 19.76%
Tax Cuts 626 10.84%
Permanent tax relief for families 563 9.75%
Federal "hate crimes" legislation 331 5.73%
No vote on this question 181 3.13%
Taxpayer funding for abortions 151 2.61%
Prayer in schools 93 1.61%
Reinstatement of the "Fairness Doctrine" 88 1.52%
Public display of the Ten Commandments 57 0.99%
Enforced obscenity laws 54 0.94%
Embryonic stem cell experiments 48 0.83%
Voluntary, student-led prayer in schools 44 0.76%
Total 5,775 100%

Now that you've got the numbers, feel free to crunch away.

Jared Bridges | 2:38 PM | | Comments (43) | TrackBacks (1)

September 21, 2007

Man who sues God gets a response

America's courts keep getting curiouser and curiouser:

LINCOLN, Nebraska (AP) -- A legislator who filed a lawsuit against God has gotten something he might not have expected: a response.

State Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha said he sued God last week to make a point about frivolous lawsuits.

One of two court filings from "God" came Wednesday under otherworldly circumstances, according to John Friend, clerk of the Douglas County District Court in Omaha.

"This one miraculously appeared on the counter. It just all of a sudden was here -- poof!" Friend said.

Frankly, I don't see how The Onion can compete with the "real" news these days...

Jared Bridges | 9:36 AM | | Comments (9)

September 18, 2007

Judge Blocks Opening of New Ill. Planned Parenthood Clinic

Back in July, FRC's Washington Update took notice of an Aurora, Illinois Planned Parenthood Clinic which surreptitiously began construction disguised as the "Gemini Health Center," only to let community residents (and construction workers) know that it was really a new location of America's largest abortion provider.

CNS News is now reporting that the clinic's opening (for now, at least) has been blocked:

(CNSNews.com) - A federal judge has at least temporarily prevented the nation's biggest abortion provider from opening a new $7.5 million clinic in Aurora, Ill., while the city government investigates charges that Planned Parenthood used secrecy and fraud to obtain permission to build the 22,000-square-foot facility.

U.S. District Judge Charles Norgle, Sr., on Monday gave Aurora officials 24 hours to file a response to a request from Planned Parenthood/Chicago Area (PPCA) for an injunction that would have forced the city to allow the new building to open on Tuesday as planned.

A hearing is set for Thursday that awaits Planned Parenthood's response.

Jared Bridges | 9:40 AM | | Comments (5) | TrackBacks (1)

If you can't beat 'em, sue 'em

From Wired News:

Nebraska State Senator Ernie Chambers filed suit against God Friday, asking a court to order the Almighty and his followers to stop making terrorist threats.

The suit (.pdf), filed in a Nebraska district court, contends that God, along with his followers of all persuasions, "has made and continues to make terroristic threats of grave harm to innumerable persons." Those threats are credible given God's history, Chambers' complaint says.

Believe it or not, this is from the AP, not The Onion. The senator is even taking pro-active steps to serve papers:

The lawsuit indicates that Chambers attempted to make God appear in order to serve him by saying "Come out, come out, wherever you are," but the Almight declined, like many defendants, to make it easy for a plaintiff to serve him with court papers.

Something tells me that this won't turn out so well for Sen. Chambers...

Jared Bridges | 9:08 AM | | Comments (4)

June 12, 2007

Swearing Off Decency? Court Strikes Down FCC Policy On Profanity

Here's today's Washington Watch Daily commentary from FRC Radio:

Continue reading "Swearing Off Decency? Court Strikes Down FCC Policy On Profanity" »

Tony Perkins | 11:26 AM | | Comments (1)

April 23, 2007

Courting Victory

Here's today's Washington Watch Daily commentary from FRC Radio:

Continue reading "Courting Victory" »

Tony Perkins | 9:43 AM |

April 18, 2007

FRC Responds to Supreme Court Decision

Here's FRC's press release:

FRC Praises Supreme Court Ruling Upholding Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
April 18, 2007

Washington D.C. - Today, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins released the following statement welcoming the Supreme Court decision upholding the Partial-birth Abortion Ban.

"This is a victory for a commonsense measure that is overwhelmingly favored by over 70 percent of the American people who increasingly support protections for unborn children. This brings the nation's abortion policy one step closer to the views of the American people. Americans are against unlimited abortion and the partial-abortion ban is the first meaningful limitation on abortion in over thirty years.

"We applaud the Court for recognizing the legitimate interest that Congress has 'in ensuring so grave a choice is well informed.' The Court rejected the idea that a group of partial-birth abortion doctors should hold veto power over the abortion policy of the entire country. The Majority is to be commended for respecting the intent of Congress who represent the American people. This is a violent and inhumane act that is never medically necessary according to the American Medical Association.

"I want to thank President Bush, Congressman Steve Chabot (R-OH), and former Senator Rick Santorum for all their hard work over the years to pass this legislation."

Jared Bridges | 12:38 PM | | Comments (1)

March 27, 2007

Case Closed on Parents' Rights

On March 26, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case of Fausey v. Hiller, in which FRC submitted an amicus curiae brief through our friends at the Alliance Defense Fund. We hoped that the Supreme Court would take the opportunity to clarify the law on the question of third-party visitation rights.

FRC contended that fit parents have the right to direct the upbringing of their children without state interference. For the state to force parents to accept visitation from other parties, who are not the legal parents of the child, is an unacceptable infringement. Currently this can occur when a court deems it to be "in the best interests of the child to have third-party visits." Such decisions risk reinforcing a growing government trend to "micromanage" the American family.

If our courts go too far and start overruling parents on these issues, then the results will not only promote worthy goals--like encouraging grandparents' access to their grandchildren--but also access by unrelated adults, whose presence the judges think would be good for children. It's not hard to see what harm judges could do with such an elastic standard.

Tony Perkins | 8:43 PM |