<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FRC Blog &#187; Plan B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/tag/plan-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.frcblog.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Plan B Linked to Greater Risk for Heart Disease</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2011/03/plan-b-linked-to-greater-risk-for-heart-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://www.frcblog.com/2011/03/plan-b-linked-to-greater-risk-for-heart-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Monahan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=5228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week there have been a number of media outlets reporting on a link between taking over-the-counter contraceptives (Plan B) and an increased risk for heart disease. The bottom line is that too much estrogen in a woman&#8217;s body is harmful for her heart. In particular, young women and girls are reportedly suffering from these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week there have been a number of media outlets reporting on a link between taking over-the-counter contraceptives (Plan B) and an increased risk for heart disease. The bottom line is that too much estrogen in a woman&#8217;s body is harmful for her heart. In particular, young women and girls are reportedly suffering from these heart problems. </p>
<p><a href="http://biomedme.com/general/contraceptive-pills-a-risk-for-womens-heart_37430.html">Here are quotes from one such story out of India</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;A vascular disease called deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is on the rise and doctors say it has a lot to do with the increase in sales of over-the-counter contraceptive pills.&#8221;</p>
<p> “Any amount of estrogen that is not required by the female body is harmful for her. The pills tend to increase the hormone level, resulting in pain and swelling caused by blood clot formation in the veins,” explained Nutan Agrawal, professor of gynaecology at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). &#8221;</p>
<p>“The reason that the problem of DVT and contraceptives is serious is that we are seeing a lot of young girls in their 20s coming up with cases of the disease,” points out Parakh, who said he gets over 15 cases of DVT in a month.<br />
&#8220;Agrawal cautioned on how over-the-counter contraceptive drugs have dominated birth control measures for the teen population: “Because of the availability of drugs with retailers, these contraceptives have become the quick fix to abortions in a very short span of time. There is certainly a need for awareness among young girls about sexual health.” </p>
<p>Sadly, Teva Pharmaceuticals recently began the FDA process to make Plan B available OTC for girls of any age; currently it is OTC for those 17 and older. Especially with this new information about the link between Plan B and heart disease, I can&#8217;t help but wonder if once again young women&#8217;s health is being sacrificed on the altar of a liberal, pro-abortion agenda. </p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"><div class="really_simple_share_facebook_like" style="width:100px;">
				<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frcblog.com%2F2011%2F03%2Fplan-b-linked-to-greater-risk-for-heart-disease%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=100&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false&amp;height=27" 
						scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100px; height:27px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
				</div><div class="really_simple_share_google1" style="width:90px;">
					<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://www.frcblog.com/2011/03/plan-b-linked-to-greater-risk-for-heart-disease/" ></g:plusone>
				</div><div class="really_simple_share_twitter" style="width:110px;">
					<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" 
						data-text="Plan B Linked to Greater Risk for Heart Disease via @FRCdc" data-url="http://www.frcblog.com/2011/03/plan-b-linked-to-greater-risk-for-heart-disease/" 
						data-via="" ></a> 
				</div></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frcblog.com/2011/03/plan-b-linked-to-greater-risk-for-heart-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ella vs. Plan B</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2010/09/ella-vs-plan-b/</link>
		<comments>http://www.frcblog.com/2010/09/ella-vs-plan-b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Monahan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=4035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the following youtube clip, Dr. Donna Harrison, OBGYN and president of the American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) continues her series of short videos explaining the medical perspective and science behind ella, the abortion drug approved by the FDA on August 13th, misleadingly labeled as an emergency contraceptive (EC). In this 48 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the following youtube clip, Dr. Donna Harrison, OBGYN and president of the American Association  of Pro-life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) continues her series of short videos explaining the medical perspective and science behind ella, the abortion drug approved by the FDA on August 13th, misleadingly labeled as an emergency contraceptive (EC).</p>
<p>In this 48 second clip, Dr. Harrison succinctly explains how ella is different than Plan B. The FDA has categorized both drugs as ECs. Until now, Plan B has been the most widely used EC in the United States.  But Plan B is in a completely different class of drugs than ella and RU-486. It is believed that Plan B does not impact an already implanted baby, although it can prevent implantation. Ella, however, can work both before and after implantation. </p>
<p>For more information watch the clip below. We encourage you to send this clip and others in the series far and wide to the women you know.  Women who deserve to know the truth about ella &#8212; how it will work in their bodies and on their babies.  </p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tFNn0V8umQ8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tFNn0V8umQ8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"><div class="really_simple_share_facebook_like" style="width:100px;">
				<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frcblog.com%2F2010%2F09%2Fella-vs-plan-b%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=100&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false&amp;height=27" 
						scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100px; height:27px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
				</div><div class="really_simple_share_google1" style="width:90px;">
					<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://www.frcblog.com/2010/09/ella-vs-plan-b/" ></g:plusone>
				</div><div class="really_simple_share_twitter" style="width:110px;">
					<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" 
						data-text="Ella vs. Plan B via @FRCdc" data-url="http://www.frcblog.com/2010/09/ella-vs-plan-b/" 
						data-via="" ></a> 
				</div></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frcblog.com/2010/09/ella-vs-plan-b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plan B:  A Failure to Meet Falsely Inflated Predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/10/plan-b-a-failure-to-meet-falsely-inflated-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/10/plan-b-a-failure-to-meet-falsely-inflated-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moira Gaul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life & Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=1901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent article published in the journal Contraception, discusses the failed &#8220;effectiveness&#8221; of the drug Plan B (a form of emergency contraception or &#8220;EC&#8221;) on a population level. The author of the articles concedes: Our expectations for EC&#8217;s effectiveness were biased upwards by an early estimate that expanding access to emergency contraception could dramatically reduce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(09)00113-9/abstract">recent article published in the journal Contraception</a>, discusses the failed &#8220;effectiveness&#8221; of the drug Plan B (a form of emergency contraception or &#8220;EC&#8221;) on a population level. The author of the articles concedes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Our expectations for EC&#8217;s effectiveness were biased upwards by an early estimate that expanding access to emergency contraception could dramatically reduce the incidence of unintended pregnancy and subsequent abortion. This estimate made a compelling story and is likely a key reason why donors and other were willing to support efforts to expand access to EC.</p></blockquote>
<p>The falsely inflated predictions noted above were &#8212; in order to dramatically decrease the incidence of unintended pregnancy and subsequent abortion &#8212; touted as valid estimates during the lead up to and the drug&#8217;s change to over the counter status to women 18 years and older in 2006. The admission of failures at a population level following expanded access is poignant. Additionally, it is clear that Planned Parenthood <a href="http://www.frc.org/content/planned-parenthood-clinic-abortion-totals-defy-national-trends">has been a primary profiteer through the increased marketing and sales process</a>.</p>
<p>The article goes on to deflect from valid flags raised by the continued self-administration of Plan B and ignores <a href="http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IF06H01">salient women&#8217;s health issues surrounding drug usage</a> including:  the lack of medical oversight by a licensed clinician during usage to screen for contraindications; the lack of medical studies to determine safety for repeated and long-term usage; and, the failure to inform women of the potential abortifacient action of the drug &#8212; a violation of informed consent.</p>
<p>Additionally, the non-medical provider oversight during drug usage ignores a 2008 study release by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stating that young women most at-risk for contracting sexually transmitted infections and disease are not being referred for testing and treatment. The self-administration of Plan B knocks out a critical link in the care and referral chain for many women at-risk for disease. Such a link is vital for both secondary prevention or screening efforts and thus, the protection of women&#8217;s reproductive health.</p>
<p>Expanded access of Plan B to both women and adolescent girls are not in the best interest of either adolescent or women&#8217;s health promotion and disease prevention.</p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"><div class="really_simple_share_facebook_like" style="width:100px;">
				<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frcblog.com%2F2009%2F10%2Fplan-b-a-failure-to-meet-falsely-inflated-predictions%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=100&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false&amp;height=27" 
						scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100px; height:27px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
				</div><div class="really_simple_share_google1" style="width:90px;">
					<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://www.frcblog.com/2009/10/plan-b-a-failure-to-meet-falsely-inflated-predictions/" ></g:plusone>
				</div><div class="really_simple_share_twitter" style="width:110px;">
					<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" 
						data-text="Plan B:  A Failure to Meet Falsely Inflated Predictions via @FRCdc" data-url="http://www.frcblog.com/2009/10/plan-b-a-failure-to-meet-falsely-inflated-predictions/" 
						data-via="" ></a> 
				</div></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/10/plan-b-a-failure-to-meet-falsely-inflated-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

