Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

Tag: Education

New Video: Who Should Decide How Your Children are Educated?

by Carrie Russell
March 29, 2011

“Who has the primary responsibility for making critical decisions about the education of school-aged children? Their parents? Or government and the school system it operates? That is a fundamental question about education policy that faces the United States as it attempts to build educational institutions for the twenty-first century.” – Jack Klenk

For more information on this topic, click here.

Tags: ,

Comments: - |

New FRC Pamphlet Available: Jack Klenk’s “Who Should Decide How Children are Educated?”

by Chris Gacek
March 23, 2011

Who Should Decide How Children are Educated?FRC is proud to announce the availability of its new policy pamphlet entitled, “Who Should Decide How Children are Educated?” by Jack Klenk.  Mr. Klenk is a retired, long-time Department of Education policy expert and proponent of educational reform.

You can download the document here. [PDF]

Primarily, Klenk asks the following linked questions:  “Who has the primary responsibility for making critical decisions about the education of school-aged children? Their parents? Or government and the school system it operates?”

Klenk presents an extended overview of the development of American public education and demonstrates that we now have a “top-down” model that has been designed to promote the preferences of experts, bureaucracies, and unions above that of parents.  Rather, a system must be developed that overturns old patterns of behavior.  The current educational system is overdue for a modernization, that will it make it more flexible, less bureaucratic, and more family-friendly.  To be authentically public, it must serve all parents from the whole public.

For education to serve the public, it must give parents access to a variety of schools, not just the monolithic government option.  The old system is a monopoly that is not suited to modern life.  As with other monopolies, it gives disproportionate weight to itself and special interests, and not enough to the customers – the parents and children.  Furthermore, monopolies always resist improvement-forcing competition.  Any new system of education for the public must leave behind the mindset that only government schools can serve the public.  Parents should be allowed to select the educational institutions that best suit their needs.

However, the reforms must be accomplished in a manner that does not interfere with the freedom and distinctive identities of nongovernmental schools.  This is critical.  Government financial support of parental educational choices cannot be allowed to threaten the independence and distinctive features (e.g., religious education) of alternative institutions.  Vouchers, tax credits, and charter schools are all part of a wave of educational change that appears to be on the horizon as the public realizes that government schools are very costly and are not performing well.

Tags: , ,

Comments: - |

“Who Should Decide How Children Are Educated?”

by Rob Schwarzwalder
March 18, 2011

Is “public education” the same thing as “government education?” Dr. Jack Klenk argues it is not, but that the two terms have been conflated, in our time, to mean the same thing.

Dr. Klenk is the author of a new FRC booklet titled, “Who Should Decide How Children Are Educated?.”  His new publication, which you can download at no charge, answers this probing question through the application of both careful analysis and common sense.

It’s a question well worth asking.  According to the federal Education Department’s National Center for Education Statistics, in constant dollars, spending per pupil in public elementary and secondary schools went from $2,769 in the 1961-62 school year to $10,041 in 2007-07 school year.

Continue reading »

Tags: ,

Comments: - |

Social Conservative Review–June 24, 2010

by Krystle Weeks
June 24, 2010

Sign up for our newest publication: The Social Conservative Review.

The Social Conservative Review:
The Insider’s Guide to Pro-Family News
June 24, 2010

FRC has recently published a comprehensive study of President Obama’s efforts to repeal the historic ban on homosexuals in the Armed Forces. Written by respected military analyst Lt. Col. (ret) Robert Maginnis, “Mission Compromised: How the Obama Administration is Drafting the Military into the Culture War” is an important contribution to the debate over this critical issue.

After over 30 years in the Marine Corps, including service as the senior military attorney, I know the serious risks present if the current “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy and law are repealed. I am compelled to speak out since those currently on active duty cannot voice their opinions. Robert Maginnis uses facts, the law, and a dose of military perspective to debunk the myths put forward by those seeking change from the current law. James C. Walker, Brig.Gen. U.S. Marine Corps (Ret.)

The free PDF of this compelling study can be downloaded here.

Educational Freedom and Reform

Environmental Issues

Faith and Policy

Health Care

Homosexuality in the Military

Judiciary

Marriage and Family

Family Economics

Marriage

Pornography

Religious Liberty

Check out Persecution.com, one of the best websites regarding Christian persecution throughout the world.

Sanctity of Life

Abortion

Adoption

Bioethics

Stem Cell Research

Other Articles of Note for Social Conservatives

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments: - |

Married Mothers Who Worship Weekly Are the Most Likely to Have a Bachelor’s Degree

by Michael Leaser
April 15, 2010

In the latest Mapping America, mothers aged 35-44 in always-intact marriages who worship at least weekly are more likely to have earned a bachelor’s degree than mothers in all other family structure and worship combinations.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments: - |

Staggering Increase in Education Spending for 2011

by Chris Gacek
February 4, 2010

Well, I checked the facts, and the Politico was correct.  I only doubted the reporting due to the massive amount of President Obama’s proposed increase in education spending.  Could it possibly be true?  Tuesday’s February 2nd Politico column by Eamon Javers and James Hohman on the newly released proposed federal budget contained this text on one of the “Winners” – Education:

Obama calls for ramped-up education spending. Department of Education outlays would increase from $32.4 billion in 2009 to $71.5 billion in 2011. Obama puts money into a laundry list of initiatives, from a $1.6 billion increase in child care funding to making permanent the expansion of Pell Grant payouts.

He has sought to please his supporters in the powerful teachers unions by pushing to rework the unpopular parts of Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act. Now he’s trying to put $3 billion more into K-12 education generally, with up to an extra $1 billion if Congress reworks the education system in the way he wants this year.

If you look at the 2011 budget’s section for the Department of Education (pp. 63-68), go to page 68 and look for the line entitled “Total, Outlays.”  There one finds that the actual 2009 budget for the Dep’t of Education was $32.409 billion and that the projected amount for 2011 is $71.479 billion.  By my calculation that is a 121% increase in two years.

I am not an expert on direct loan programs, but on the same page the figures for disbursements increases from $100.7 billion (2009 actual) to $135.0 billion (2011 projected) – a 34% increase over two years.  This Congress wants to enact a statute to federalize the student loan programs, so the budget contains this gobbledygook comment: “This measure would then use savings to make historic investments to increase college access and success, and would lay a foundation for success for America’s youngest children.”  What does that mean?  $$,$$$,$$$,$$$.$$  Good grief.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments: 1 |

Exposé of Safe & Drug-Free Schools “Czar” Kevin Jennings

by Jared Bridges
December 15, 2009

New video exposé of U.S. Department of Education Safe & Drug-Free Schools “Czar” Kevin Jennings:

Read more at stopjennings.org.

Tags: , ,

Comments: - |

Praise for Tufts University’s New Policy on Dorm Room Sex

by Cathy Ruse
October 2, 2009

The state of morality on the American college campus seems to be in perpetual decline, and I have shuddered to think about what it will be like in a dozen years when my own daughters will be getting ready for college.  But from a liberal college in a liberal state comes a small ray of hope.  Tufts University has revised its “guest policy” for dorm visitors for the new school year to include the following new rule:  “You may not engage in sexual activity while your roommate is present in the room.”

Shouldn’t this be obvious?  Word from my friends with kids in college is that, shockingly, it’s not.  Nor is it a problem unique to Tufts.

So a tip of the hat to the Tufts’ administration for having the courage to draw a line.  And if Tufts can do it, any school can.

Tags: , ,

Comments: 1 |

In the Know…

by Krystle Weeks
September 24, 2009

Here’s something for your news cravings today.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments: - |

God + Two Parents = Fewer Worries about Children’s Achievement

by Michael Leaser
September 15, 2009

In the latest Mapping America, the National Survey of Children’s Health shows that children who live with both biological parents or with two adoptive parents and worship at least monthly have parents who score lowest on the parental concerns scale.

Tags: , , ,

Comments: - |

Two Parents = Fewer Worries about Children’s Achievement

by Michael Leaser
September 8, 2009

In the latest Mapping America, the National Survey of Children’s Health shows that children who live with both biological parents or with two adoptive parents are less likely to have parents who have concerns about their children’s achievement.

Tags: , ,

Comments: - |

Back to School with President Obama

by Tony Perkins
September 6, 2009

In the Know…

by Krystle Weeks
September 2, 2009

Gone are the days of the Daily Buzz and Blogosphere Buzz. Instead, I decided to incorporate the two to create “In the Know.” Don’t worry, you will still receive your daily dose of news.

Here’s some articles of interest for your morning:

Tags: , , , ,

Comments: - |

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
July 31, 2009

Here’s a compilation of articles for your reading pleasure.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments: - |

God + Two Parents = Fewer Calls Home from School about Children’s Behavior Problems

by Michael Leaser
June 2, 2009

In the latest Mapping America, the National Survey of Children’s Health shows that children from intact families who worship at least monthly are less likely to have their school report behavior problems to their parents than are children who live in non-intact households and worship less than monthly.

Tags: , , ,

Comments: - |

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
June 1, 2009

Save School Choice in Washington, D.C.

by Krystle Weeks
May 6, 2009

Today, I had the opportunity to attend the “Save Our D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Rally” at Freedom Plaza. Students from several Charter and private schools were in attendance chanting, “Put Kids First,” as well as parents, who were very concerned about the loss of funding for the D.C. Opportunity Scholarships, which allow students to attend private schools, instead of lower performing public schools throughout the District.

The crowd heard from many speakers, including Former Mayor Anthony Williams, Council member Marion Barry, School Choice advocate, Virginia Walden Ford, and many others, who were concerned about the education system in Washington, D.C.  While there were many parents who spoke on behalf of the scholarships, the real impact came from two young men who talked about the education that they are able to achieve at the private schools where they are attending, compared to the public schools they used to attend. Both of these young men are brilliant, and there is no doubt that they will be able to achieve whatever career path they choose to pursue. Here is the video of their speech:

Why President Obama would want to end their dreams by eliminating these scholarships is puzzling. Obama was a product of a quality private education, and he has chosen the same education for his daughters, Sasha and Malia. Why would he deny the same opportunity for students in the District?

Tags: , , ,

Comments: - |