<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FRC Blog &#187; Diana DeGette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/tag/diana-degette/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='www.frcblog.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Mister, can you spare a copy of the Constitution? [UPDATED 11/18]</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/11/mister-can-you-spare-a-copy-of-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/11/mister-can-you-spare-a-copy-of-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Perkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perkins' Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diana DeGette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupak-Pitts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=2190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If so, please send it to Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.). She is the latest example of a Member of Congress who should not be there. I am sure the Founders never envisioned elected Representatives who would not have a grasp of the most basic concepts of the Constitution. It may be time for an amendment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If so, please send it to Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.).  She is the latest example of a Member of Congress who should not be there.  I am sure the Founders never envisioned elected Representatives who would not have a grasp of the most basic concepts of the Constitution.  It may be time for an amendment requiring members of Congress to take a basic proficiency test on at least the Bill of Rights.</p>
<p>Still lamenting the overwhelming defeat that she and her pro-abortion cohorts suffered in the House when the Stupak-Pitts amendment was attached to the health care bill, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/68115-degette-says-stupak-will-lack-votes-to-keep-his-amendment">Rep. DeGette is now calling for religiously-affiliated groups to be shut out of the public policy process</a> as the bill goes to the Senate.</p>
<p>&#8220;Last I heard, we had separation of church and state in this country,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I&#8217;ve got to say that I think the Catholic bishops and all of the other groups shouldn&#8217;t have input.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words if a group of people who are in association with one another because of their Christian faith, they should not have a collective voice in the crafting of public policy.  What she is asserting is that if your ideas and actions are a product of your faith, you’re a second class citizen and your voice should not be heard.</p>
<p>This is a far cry from what the Founders believed.  Several months after the British surrender at Yorktown, George Washington, in a letter to the Reformed German Congregation of New York, wrote, &#8220;The establishment of civil and religious liberty was the motive which induced me to the field (of combat).&#8221;  Sadly, Diana DeGette seems eager to smother these precious freedoms, neither of which can exist without the other.</p>
<p>Rep. DeGette’s comments serve to only further confirm that this takeover is not about healthcare, it is about a radical social policy in which the expansion of abortion, at tax-payer expense, is at the very center of this effort.</p>
<p>If you have a spare Constitution, send it to Congresswoman DeGette.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE 11/18 (Editor):</strong> It now appears that <em>The Hill</em> inaccurately quoted Rep. DeGette.  <a href="http://www.frc.org/pressrelease/frc-issues-correction-diana-degette-says-allow-input-of-religious-groups-but-accuses-groups-of-violating--separation-of-church-and-state">See Tony Perkins&#8217; correction and further statements here</a>.</p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"><div class="really_simple_share_facebook_like" style="width:100px;">
				<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frcblog.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fmister-can-you-spare-a-copy-of-the-constitution%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=100&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;send=false&amp;height=27" 
						scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:100px; height:27px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
				</div><div class="really_simple_share_google1" style="width:90px;">
					<g:plusone size="medium" href="http://www.frcblog.com/2009/11/mister-can-you-spare-a-copy-of-the-constitution/" ></g:plusone>
				</div><div class="really_simple_share_twitter" style="width:110px;">
					<a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" 
						data-text="Mister, can you spare a copy of the Constitution? [UPDATED 11/18] via @FRCdc" data-url="http://www.frcblog.com/2009/11/mister-can-you-spare-a-copy-of-the-constitution/" 
						data-via="" ></a> 
				</div></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/11/mister-can-you-spare-a-copy-of-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

