Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

Intensity, the Values Voter Summit, and Dr. Krauthammer

by Robert Morrison
September 29, 2011

Dr. Charles Krauthammer has been hailed by National Review as “The Leader of the Opposition.” He is indisputably one of Washington’s wise men. His critiques of the manifold errors of the Obama administration are legendary. But in one particular, I suspect, he is flat wrong.

He recently opined that “voter intensity” does not matter because all the votes are equal on election day. He’s correct that you cannot pull the lever five times to indicate your impassioned support of your candidate (sorry Chicago).

But voter intensity is the key to winning elections. Voter intensity counts because the number of votes will depend on how motivated is the electorate. One radio talker this week mourned that GOP voters had “to hold their noses” last time and, “unfortunately, there weren’t enough of them.” Try to envision those nose-holders rushing to the polls. It would be funny if it were not so sad.

Voter intensity could be seen throughout the Northern states in the 1860 presidential election as tens of thousands of young “Wide Awakes” marched forLincoln. Soon, tragically, many of them would be marching to their deaths in places like Manassas and Fredericksburg. But that voter intensity was needed in the North because Lincoln was not even on the ballot in ten slaveholding states.

Voter intensity explains the landslide victories of Theodore Roosevelt in 1904 and Warren G. Harding in 1920. In that other era of economic distress, the 1930s, voter intensity produced Franklin D. Roosevelt’s stunning back-to-back victories.

One of FDR’s impassioned 1932 supporters was even so cheeky as to send a telegram to the White House to the embattled President Herbert Hoover: “Vote for Roosevelt; Make it Unanimous.” Now, that’s voter intensity.

I saw voter intensity in Virginia in 2008.  Barack Obama’s campaign had 82 headquarters staffed by volunteers statewide. John McCain had but one. Is it any wonder Mr. Obama became the first Democrat since Lyndon Johnson to carry the Old Dominion?

Next week, I plan to attend the Values Voter Summit. I’ll have a chance to work on the FRC booth and to meet the thousands of intense Values Voters who will be coming to Washington’s Omni Shoreham hotel. It’s always an interesting and worthwhile time. You get to meet leaders from throughout the nation, and even from some foreign countries here to see how the Yankees do it.

I’ve walked precincts in every election save one since I could vote. It’s an important way to learn what voters care about. A recent speech at the Reagan Library by a non-candidate created a stir when that important state governor promoted “earned American exceptionalism.” I think he was right about that—as the phrase was later explained.

The speech was said to be presidential.

Maybe. But the reason there is a Reagan Library is because President Reagan spoke of America as “a shining city on a hill.” You didn’t have to have a Ph.D. in comparative government to understand what he meant. You learn that when you work a precinct.

The great American presidents were great because they communicated great ideas. “Mr. Gorbachev: Tear down this wall.” Profound and readily understandable. “This government of the people by the people for the people shall not perish from the earth.”

Clear.

I’m always bemused when I read biographies of Lincoln. I get the feeling their authors have never walked a precinct. They invariably depict President Lincoln as hounded, beset, and burdened by the swarms of office-seekers and favor askers who descended on his White House. Lincoln himself noted the problem of trying to fill offices while some states were seceding: “I feel like a man trying to rent rooms at one end of the house while the other end is on fire!”

But he could easily have delegated the task of party manager and political boss to others. That’s what the Postmaster General was used for by many presidents. Lincoln kept all the reins in his own hands for a good reason. He wanted to build his political base and he wanted to take his daily “public opinion baths” by seeing scores of local political activists.  He knew that by seeing these folks, he could keep his finger on the pulse of what was happening in the country.

Next week, at the Omni, you won’t have to walk the precincts. The precincts will walk to you. That’s why I love the Values Voter Summit.


Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.

Comments

By: (Mrs.) Dorothy Robbins | September 30, 2011 at 7:21 pm

Most people know little about Lincoln, the first president to declare war without the benefit of Congress, after creating an event to “justify” his wanting to do so. No one seems to know exactly why he wanted the war in the first place although, two years into the war “to save the union” he declared it was to do away with slavery. There’s more to that than meets the eye, too.

As to “saving the union,” many states (other than the southern ones) had already indicated their desire to secede-a right those independent sovereignties had a right to do. They had VOLUNTEERED TO JOIN; THEIRS WAS A RIGHT TO UNVOLUNTEER-in spite of Lincoln’s unconstitutional ides. Check it out! “The Real Lincoln,” Sprinkle publications

Write a comment






Currently you have JavaScript disabled. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.