Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

Month: June, 2010

Blinded Patients See Again with Adult Stem Cells

by David Prentice
June 29, 2010

This story was reported earlier at a scientific meeting, but Italian doctors have now published the details of their success at restoring sight to blind patients using their own adult stem cells.

The Italian team treated 112 patients who had experienced chemical burns to the cornea. One patient who had his sight restored had been blind for 50 years. The doctors isolated adult stem cells from a portion of the patient’s eye, grew the cells in the lab to create a new cornea, and transplanted the new cells onto the damaged eyes. They achieved total success in 77% of patients and partial vision restoration in 13% of patients; the restored vision has lasted up to ten years so far, with some calling it a “permanent” restoration of sight.

The study is published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Comments: - |

Gumming Up Bones with Adult Stem Cells

by David Prentice
June 29, 2010

Italian doctors report that they have used adult stem cells to regenerate bone lost through severe gum disease in patients. Dr. Marco Baldoni and his team at the University of Milan Patients with periodontitis experience receeding gums and the destruction of gum and bone tissue. In a ten-year study, the Italian researchers found that lost bone could be regenerated using adult stem cells. Patients had some of their bone marrow adult stem cells removed and cultured on a special collagen protein support, then the cells were injected into affected bone. Within a few months, the adult stem cells had entirely regenerated the bone lost through disease. So far, the procedure has been used for seven patients, in every case successfully. According to Dr. Baldoni:

“In fact, the preliminary results indicate that the level of bone regeneration is even greater than those obtained with traditional methods.”

Adult stem cells certainly give you something to chew on. Regrowth of jaw bone is just the most recent example of using adult stem cells for patients to stimulate hip bone growth and to repair non-healing bones.

Comments: 1 |

Robert Byrd, Senator for Spending

by Rob Schwarzwalder
June 28, 2010

The death of Senator Robert C. Byrd should give thoughtful Americans pause. Sen. Byrd was married for 69 years and was never tied to any moral or financial scandal. His personal life seems to have been exemplary, and in an age of tawdry political scandals this is not a small thing.

That he was briefly a member (a “Kleagle”) of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1940s became a rightful source of lifelong shame to him. The legacy of his racist past popped up from time to time, as when he used a coarse racial epithet in a 2004 interview with FOX News.

Today, though, the media are waxing rhapsodic about Sen. Byrd’s love of the Constitution. Many outlets are noting that he carried a small copy with him and that it was “well worn.” The Associated Press even writes that “Byrd’s lodestar was protecting the Constitution. He frequently pulled out a dog-eared copy of it from a pocket in one of his trademark three-piece suits.”

No one can dispute that Sen. Byrd frequently cited the Constitution and the prerogatives of the Senate. Yet, one might question whether or not the Constitution truly was his “lodestar.”

Sen. Byrd voted for some of the most anti-constitutional justices in Supreme Court history, men and women for whom the Constitution is legal putty to be reshaped in whatever form their ideological predispositions direct. He voted for an unconstitutional mandate upon all Americans that requires them to purchase health insurance. He supported Roe v. Wade and, perhaps most famously, welcomed his role as one of the Senates’ most vigorous pork-barrel spenders.

“I’m going to do everything I can for the people of West Virginia. That’s my duty! You can call it pork, if you want to, but that’s all right. I know what my duty is. My duty is to my people,” Sen. Byrd argued.

His people, indeed. In an embarrassing speech in 2002, he even called himself “Big Daddy” for his ability to funnel money to West Virginia projects.

Sen. Byrd called the Appropriations Committee, of which he was chair for many years, “the greatest committee.” In one sense, he was right – Appropriations has authority to spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually, which even in spendthrift DC is real power.

Sen. Byrd steered hundreds of millions to the Mountaineer State. Perhaps it is for that reason that Sen. Byrd’s name now graces nearly 40 locations in West Virginia.

Yet the Constitution nowhere gives Congress the authority to cull monies from the citizens of the various states and redistribute it as Senate power-brokers so desire. This is nothing more than legalized theft, and it is anti-constitutional.

Sen. Byrd, in all his writing and pondering about the U.S. Senate, its rules and its duties, should perhaps have taken counsel from the Senate’s first president, Thomas Jefferson: “To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.”

Being a big spender of other people’s money is not the worst epitaph a statesman can have. Not the best, but not the worst.

Tags:

Comments: 2 |

Lawsuit Reinstated to Stop Federal Funding of Embryo-Destructive Research

by David Prentice
June 25, 2010

The Federal Court of Appeals has reinstated a lawsuit that seeks to block federal funding of research that involves the destruction of human embryos, finding that doctors doing adult stem cell research have ‘competitive standing’ to sue.

The lawsuit, Sherley et al. v. Sebelius et al., had been heard in U.S. District Court on October 14, 2009, and had been dismissed with a decision that the plaintiffs lacked standing. The lawsuit is brought by a broad coalition of plaintiffs, including two adult stem cell scientists–Dr. James L. Sherley, a senior scientist at the Boston Biomedical Research Institute; and Dr. Theresa Deisher, the founder, managing member, and research and development director of AVM Biotechnology.

A 3-judge panel of the Appeals Court reversed the order of the District court regarding lack of standing, and returned the case to the District Court for further proceedings.

Comments: - |

New ObamaCare Regulations May Eliminate Some Existing Policies

by Chris Gacek
June 25, 2010

They have not received an enormous amount of press, but the White House announced new interim health care regulations on Tuesday that implement Obamacare – the Affordable Care Act. (See the Washington Times story.)  Here’s a micro-summary of what they do:

The new regulations will strengthen the law’s so-called “patients’ bill of rights,” including the end of insurance companies denying coverage to children with pre-existing medical conditions and caps on lifetime coverage limits.

A friend of FRC wrote me a note about these new rules and the coverage limits – annual as well as lifetime:

….the restriction on annual coverage limits (which applies even to grandfathered plans) was supposed to be phased in between now and 2014 to help minimize premium cost increases. These new regulations set $750,000 as the minimum annual individual limit starting September 23 of this year! This goes to $1.25 million the following year, and then $2 million until 2014 when no limits will be permitted at all. So much for limiting premium cost increases! Most policies I have seen have a lifetime maximum of $1 million, so this will blow costs through the roof, immediately.

This expert on employee benefit policy was clearly surprised and went on to make additional points.  Many individually-purchased policies are affordable only because the insured is willing to limit the maximum policy payout for annual and total benefits.  This is reasonable and beneficial – policy purchasers then have an incentive to contain medical costs if there is a maximum payout that does not equal infinity and 00/100 dollars or the practical equivalent thereof.  Also, insurance companies can plan for their maximum possible obligation under the current policy structure.  All that said, the analyst predicted that many affordable individual policies now will not be renewed – undermining the claim that if you liked your old insurance you can keep it.  Well, you can’t keep your health insurance policy if it is regulated out of existence by government rules that make it actuarially and economically untenable.

Comments: - |

Social Conservative Review–June 24, 2010

by Krystle Weeks
June 24, 2010

Sign up for our newest publication: The Social Conservative Review.

The Social Conservative Review:
The Insider’s Guide to Pro-Family News
June 24, 2010

FRC has recently published a comprehensive study of President Obama’s efforts to repeal the historic ban on homosexuals in the Armed Forces. Written by respected military analyst Lt. Col. (ret) Robert Maginnis, “Mission Compromised: How the Obama Administration is Drafting the Military into the Culture War” is an important contribution to the debate over this critical issue.

After over 30 years in the Marine Corps, including service as the senior military attorney, I know the serious risks present if the current “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy and law are repealed. I am compelled to speak out since those currently on active duty cannot voice their opinions. Robert Maginnis uses facts, the law, and a dose of military perspective to debunk the myths put forward by those seeking change from the current law. James C. Walker, Brig.Gen. U.S. Marine Corps (Ret.)

The free PDF of this compelling study can be downloaded here.

Educational Freedom and Reform

Environmental Issues

Faith and Policy

Health Care

Homosexuality in the Military

Judiciary

Marriage and Family

Family Economics

Marriage

Pornography

Religious Liberty

Check out Persecution.com, one of the best websites regarding Christian persecution throughout the world.

Sanctity of Life

Abortion

Adoption

Bioethics

Stem Cell Research

Other Articles of Note for Social Conservatives

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments: - |

Barbarossa: 22 June 1941

by Robert Morrison
June 22, 2010

It was a quiet Sunday morning just before dawn in early summer 69 years ago. The Soviet border guards had nervously reported sighting clouds of dust over the western horizon in the previous days. Increasing numbers of aircraft with swastika markings on their wings had been “overflying” the Soviet airspace.

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill sent repeated messages to Communist dictator Josef Stalin in the Kremlin: Hitler is going to attack the Soviet Union. British intelligence had confirmed that after the last great Luftwaffe bombing raid over London on 10 May 1941, German aircraft, armored units, and infantry were all moving toward the east. Hitler had proclaimed his intentions to the world in his book, Mein Kampf (“My Struggle”) He saw the east as the place where Germany’s burgeoning population would find lebensraum—room to live.

Despite all warnings and all indications, Stalin refused to believe that Hitler would attack him. He had signed a “Non-Aggression Pact” with Hitler barely two years earlier. In late August, 1939, Hitler had felt secure to go to war with the British and the French over Poland. He knew that the Pact would prevent Stalin from attacking him from the east.

Continue reading »

Tags: ,

Comments: 2 |

Sight Restored to Blinded Patients using Their Own Adult Stem Cells

by David Prentice
June 18, 2010

Italian scientists report that they have restored sight to patients blinded by chemical burns using the patient’s own adult stem cells. The team treated 112 patients blinded in one or both eyes; some of whom had been blind for years. Adult stem cells were taken from the edge of a patient’s eye and cultured on fibrin, then the cell layers transplanted onto the damaged eyes. The adult stem cells produced healthy corneas and functioning eyes. Some patients regained sight within two months, while for others with deeper injuries the process took a year before vision was restored. Patients were followed up to ten years after the transplant. After a single transplant, 69% of patients regained vision; in some cases a second transplant occurred, with a total success in 77% of patients and partial vision restoration in 13% of patients. The long-term restoration was an especially encouraging success of the study.

Lead researcher Dr. Graziella Pellegrini, of the University of Modena, said:

“The patients, they are happy, even the partial successes. We have a couple of patients who were blind in both eyes. Can you imagine for these patients the change in their quality of life?”

According to the scientists, the key to success was insuring a high enough concentration of adult stem cells in the graft, so that the stem cells could continue to generate new tissue. The team reported their findings at the annual meeting of the International Society for Stem Cell Research. You can find the abstract on page 64 of the meeting program (WARNING: 17MB pdf file!)

Comments: 2 |

Miracle at the New York Times, Trouble for America

by Rob Schwarzwalder
June 18, 2010

We live in a world where the extraordinary has become commonplace.

A laptop computer in a coffee shop in Tulsa can link to a climber on Mt. Everest.  We walk into a typical suburban supermarket and are faced with an overwhelming variety of every imaginable foodstuff, from 300 types of ice cream to 15 varieties of mozzarella cheese.  Intricate surgery can be performed remotely through electronic “arms.”  Finely-crafted telescopes can take us into the far reaches of a previously unexplored universe.

These things are amazing.  But this morning I am deeply gratified that I have lived to see the day when the front page printed-edition of The New York Times carries a headline that more generally would befit Rush Limbaugh’s website than the cover of the Gray Lady: “Strong Steps or Oversteps? BP Is Latest Example of Tactic by Obama.”

Do wonders never cease?

The Times cites the President’s successful effort to get BP to commit to a $20 billion compensation fund as a “display of raw armtwisting” through which Mr. Obama “has reinvigorated a debate about the renewed reach of government power, or, alternatively, the power of government overreach.”  The article concludes with this: “(Mr. Obama should) avoid painting with such a broad brush that foreign and domestic investors come to view the United States as a too risky place to do business, a country where big mistakes can lead to vilification and, perhaps, bankruptcy.”

This is only the latest episode in which the President has used the pretext of a crisis to seize power.  No one excuses whatever legal or ethical lapses BP committed in the Gulf.  Eleven men are dead, and countless gallons of crude oil continue to spew into the water around the Gulf Coast.

Yet what would Mr. Obama have done if BP had declined setting up such a massive fund and, instead, stuck to the $75 million mandated by law?  Outlawed the firm’s presence on our shores?  Filed a massive, punitive, bankrupting lawsuit?

Mr. Obama used American concerns with our medical insurance system to ram-through an unconstitutional mandate that all citizens possess health insurance, and included in his legislation provisions that provide federal subsidies to abortion providers.  Additionally, the impenetrable measure is almost incalculably expensive.

He used a recession to ram through a “stimulus” package that places the federal government in the role of doling out hundreds of billions of dollars to private industry, thereby becoming a principal source of industrial growth.  This growth will collapse, however, once the paper on which it is running crumbles in the fiscal wind.  Then what?

He leveraged a crisis in the auto industry to make two of the three largest American auto companies fiefs of the federal government, to the point of forcing one of their boards to fire its CEO.

He eliminated private-source education loans, making college students dependent on Uncle Sam for their post-secondary education.

He is seeking to push homosexuals into the military, diminish religious liberty, skewer the public understanding of abortion (by saying we must reduce the “need” for abortion – his Administration’s term of art – he insinuates that such need sometimes exists), consolidate the private financial system into a federally-run bureaucracy, and make homosexuality culturally normative.

His Treasury Department is pumping out money at an obviously unsustainable rate, placing us on the path to hyper-inflation and, thus, federal seizure of private assets to avert complete default.

Just wait until America faces a serious military emergency – say, another 9-11 style attack.  How will this President use it to advance his vision of an America where “solidarity” trumps liberty?

When America’s liberal paper of record wonders about Mr. Obama’s overreach, it’s clear something is registering with even the elites: This is a different kind of presidency, a giant step down the road to serfdom described in the 1940s by Friederich Hayek.

In 1781, Thomas Jefferson – as much a prophet as a future President – wrote in his Notes on Virginia, “Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.”  From entitlements to stimulus packages to assorted federal power-grabs, we are at grave risk of becoming a subservient people, intellectually anesthetized by the superficial veneer of government-induced prosperity and security at the cost of our liberty, prosperity, self-reliance and, most essentially, virtue.

The Bible warns us not to place our trust in princes (Psalm 146:3), and for a reason: Our confidence must be in God and, as citizens, in the pathway for public life laid out in the Constitution.

Is it?  And if it is, shall we oppose the collapse of the America we have known and love?  The answer seems clear, if only we will act on it.

Tags: ,

Comments: 1 |

Dr. Donna Harrison’s Remarks to FDA on Drug Application for Ulipristal

by Chris Gacek
June 18, 2010

On Thursday, June 17, 2010, the Food and Drug Administration held a hearing about the new drug application for Ella (“ulipristal”) – the next emergency contraceptive that will be sold in the United States.  FRC and other groups will have more to say about Ella, but we thought it was important to post the brief, prepared remarks of Dr. Donna Harrison, the president of the American Association of Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG).  Here is a transcript of Dr. Harrison’s statement to the FDA Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs:

Good Afternoon.  I am Dr. Donna Harrison, board-certified OBGYN.  On behalf of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists I want to thank you for allowing us to address this committee.

Our concerns regarding the lack of safety studies for ulipristal are detailed in our written submission in your folder.  I will limit comments to the lack of reproductive toxicology information, without which ulipristal should not be approved for use in women of childbearing potential.

The European Medicines Agency noted that, “As expected, ulipristal acetate is embryotoxic at low doses.”

The EMEA also noted, “Ulipristal acetate prevents progesterone from occupying its receptor, thus the gene transcription normally turned on by progesterone is blocked, and the proteins necessary to begin and maintain pregnancy are not synthesized.”

Ulipristal’s embryolethal and fetocidal action is identical to mifepristone, from which ulipristal is derived.  Both act at the level of the ovary-inhibiting granulosa cell production of progesterone needed to maintain pregnancy through the first 10 weeks of gestation.  Both also directly block progesterone receptors at endometrial glands and stroma, destroying maternal placental tissues.

Information on this embryotoxic and fetotoxic mechanism of action is critical to informed consent for women.

Many women have ethical qualms about using a drug capable of aborting an early pregnancy.

Clear information about the embryotoxic and fetotoxic potential must be included on the product label for adequate informed consent.

It is predictable that progesterone blockade will have profound embryolethal and developmental effects on the embryo fetus exposed to ulipristal. Yet, reproductive toxicology studies were never completed.  The effect of ulipristal on fetal development is unknown, highlighting the failure of the European voluntary pregnancy registry to provide answers to this critically important question, and illustrating the need for a mandatory fetal registry such as the one now utilized for accutane.

Since fetal safety information is lacking, the EMEA label states “Ella One is contraindicated during an existing or suspected pregnancy.”  However, in use as an emergency contraceptive, it is impossible to prevent ulipristal use in pregnancy, as illustrated by the clinical trials which support this NDA.  In each trial, there were women whose urine pregnancy tests were negative prior to use of ulipristal, but were later found by pre-administration serum pregnancy tests to have been already pregnant at the time of ulipristal use, so under the best circumstances of a clinical trial, pre-existing pregnancy could not be excluded.  The European Medicines Agency noted that ulipristal can be detected in reproductive tissues up to 14 days after administration.

In the real world, it is inevitable that women who are already pregnant will unknowingly take ulipristal.  In addition, ulipristal’s 2% failure rate means that 2 out of every 100 women who use this drug will carry a fetus exposed to ulipristal, a drug known to interfere with placental development.  It is irresponsible that basic reproductive toxicology studies called for by the ICH GCP Guidelines, for drugs designed for use in women of childbearing potential, have not been completed for ulipristal.

Voluntary fetal registration from Europe has proven to be inadequate to answer basic questions of safety.  Since use of ulipristal as emergency contraception will inevitably result in women using the drug in pregnancy, approval of ulipristal will put the FDA in the untenable position of approving a drug which is contraindicated in pregnancy for an indication in which use in pregnancy is inevitable, and for which inadequate safety information is available.

This reason alone is sufficient for the FDA to deny approval of ulipristal for use as emergency contraception.  Our other concerns are detailed in our written submission.

Thank you.

The FDA Advisory Committee ignored Dr. Harrison’s comments and failed to provide future ulipristal patients with any information about its abortifacient properties in the product’s labeling (package inserts).

Comments: - |

Video: Capitol Hill News Conference on Federal Funding for Abortion Advocates

by Carrie Russell
June 17, 2010

At a June 16 Capitol Hill news conference, Family Research Council joined members of Congress and other pro-life leaders to discuss the Government Accountability Office’s report on federal funding for abortion advocates. The report was requested by Rep. Pete Olson (R-TX) and other key members of Congress. The report revealed that six organizations connected to the abortion agenda received over a billion dollars in federal funds between 2002 and 2009. The organizations included Planned Parenthood Federation of America, International Planned Parenthood Federation and Guttmacher Institute.

Tags: ,

Comments: 1 |

Gene-Engineered Adult Stem Cells to Fight HIV

by David Prentice
June 17, 2010

Scientists at City of Hope in Duarte, California have shown that it may be possible to genetically engineer a patient’s own adult stem cells to fight HIV. Four patients with AIDS received their own adult stem cells to treat lymphoma, including some of their cells that had been engineered with three genes to fight off HIV infection. One of the gene therapy targets was a protein receptor on immune cells (CCR5) that HIV binds to when infecting a cell, the idea being to prevent infection of the engineered stem cells. The other two engineered genes were designed to attack viral RNA that might make it into the cell, preventing production of viral protein.

While the dose of engineered stem cells was too low to produce an effect on the patients’ viral load, the study showed no adverse effects from the procedure and that the cells survived, engrafted, and continued producing the engineered genes for up to two years after the transplant for three of the four patients.

A previous study had treated leukemia in an AIDS patient using donor adult stem cell transplant, in which the donor was selected specifically for lack of the CCR5 receptor on the donor stem cells. The patient recovered from the leukemia and also exhibited no sign of HIV.

The current study was published in Science Translational Medicine.

Comments: 1 |

The Voyage of the Dawn Treader

by Michael Leaser
June 17, 2010

C.S. Lewis’s The Voyage of the Dawn Treader contains one of the most powerful and unique depictions of fallenness and grace in modern literature. It’s also a rousing adventure tale that leads its voyagers to the edge of the world and Aslan’s country. This morning, 20th Century Fox and Walden Media released the first trailer for their third installment of the Narnia film series. The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader opens in theaters December 10.

Comments: 1 |

Building Bone for Wounded Warriors

by David Prentice
June 17, 2010

Dr. Kent Leach at UC-Davis has been working on strategies to regenerate functional tissues, to repair or replace damaged tissues. Leach’s lab has developed methods combining adult stem cells and composite gel matrices to stimulate tissue regeneration, including growth of bone.

Dr. Leach has now received a Hypothesis Development Award from the U.S. Army to explore an approach to speed bone healing. The research will help development of effective treatments for wounded soldiers or veterans struggling with slow-healing or non-healing bone damage. Soldiers in combat suffer massive wounds to bone and tissue, with about 70% of war wounds as musculoskeletal injuries, over half of those being to the arms and legs.

Dr. Leach’s approach will use adult stem cells derived from human adipose (fat) tissue, embedding the cells into a special hydrogel and implanting directly in the injured site. The approach offers the advantages of using the patient’s own easily-harvested cells, and increasing the concentration of cells and bone-building substances at the site of the injury.

According to Dr. Leach:

“Stem cells from adipose tissue are an exciting alternative to stem cells from bone marrow or other tissues because we can isolate a large number, no matter what the patient’s condition is.”

Comments: 1 |

Promise for Lungs with Adult Stem Cells

by David Prentice
June 17, 2010

Australian researchers have published a breakthrough that shows promise of adult stem cell treatments for lung diseases. The team isolated human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs) from term placenta that have stem cell and anti-inflammatory properties. The cells were able to differentiate into lung-type cells, and when injected into mice with lung damage, the cells reduced inflammation and scarring in the lungs.

The study’s lead researcher, Associate Professor Yuben Moodley, said:

“I would think that it may be pretty useful in patients who are on ventilators and have then developed inflammation from the ventilation and subsequent scarring, so in acute respiratory distress syndrome, as we call, it would be useful.
“It may be useful in patients with emphysema, patients with occupational lung diseases like asbestosis and probably in patients with severe asthma where there’s a strong inflammatory component and scarring that may be treated.”

Professor Moodley also noted that:

“Given that there are no ethical issues, that the cells are freely available from discarded placenta and that they could be easily grown and injected, it would be a near-term issue rather than a long-term issue.”

The study is published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

Comments: 1 |

He, Being Dead, Yet Speaketh: The Sad Legacy of Sen. Edward Kennedy

by Rob Schwarzwalder
June 16, 2010

The late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA) believed in “rights” for homosexuals, federally funded abortion premised on the validity of Roe v. Wade, high taxes, an expansive and ever-expanding federal government, an anemic national defense and a host of things at which conservatives rightly recoil.

Now, newly released KGB documents give hard evidence of the Senator’s efforts to secretly work with the Soviet government (the KGB, no less) to undermine the foreign and military policies of President Reagan. The documents are indisputably accurate, and some of them were first reported in The Times of London as early as 1992, and were written about in 2006 by distinguished Grove City College professor and biographer Paul Kengor.

Kennedy had an engaging smile and, to those to whom he chose to show it, great personal warmth. But for sheer brute-force politics, he had few equals. Consider the case of Dr. Carol Iannone, a brilliant scholar at New York University. Dr. Iannone was nominated by the first President Bush to serve on the advisory panel of the National Endowment for the Humanities. Not a cabinet or sub-Cabinet post, not a vital national security position – an academic advisory board.

Yet Kennedy fiercely opposed her. Why? Because, he reportedly told confidants, he needed something to show he had not lost his clout after the embarrassing revelation of his 1991 Easter weekend sexual behavior (conducted in the presence of his then-young son Patrick).

Here’s how the Chicago Tribune describes what happened:

(Senate Labor and Human Resources) Committee insiders-who can be presumed to know more than mere Capitol Hill observers-say that political considerations back home in Boston may be part of it. Kennedy still dominates Massachusetts politics, in large part because of the seniority and power he wields as a committee chairman. Once in a while you have to flex your muscles to show you have that power, they said. Iannone … provided one of few opportunities for Kennedy to knock someone into the ditch.

Kennedy won: Dr. Iannone’s nomination was defeated. Her career was diminished and the nation lost the benefit of her service. But Ted got a bit of his street cred back and, to him, that’s what really mattered.

I confess to having a high level of disdain for the legislative career of the late Senator, a once stout advocate for the unborn who “matured” and for roughly 35 years never met a pro-abortion proposal he didn’t like. And then there was his sordid (at least until his second marriage) personal life.

Yet to think he sought to undermine the President of the United States on vital matters of foreign policy and jeopardize the security of our country – and for his own presidential aspirations, no less, according to the KGB files – drops him down to a deeper level of infamy altogether.

Tags:

Comments: - |

Capitol Hill Briefing: Feds Aren’t Enforcing Obscenity Laws

by Chris Gacek
June 15, 2010

As Carrie Russell notes below, Pat Trueman (pornharms.com), a former federal obscenity prosecutor, led an important briefing in the Capitol Visitor’s Center today that was open to the public.  Extended segments of the event will be posted on the PornHarms website, but here were the main points of the event.  First, hard core pornography – “obscenity” in legal parlance – is not protected speech under the First Amendment.   As such, distribution of obscene materials can be federally prosecuted without constitutional difficulty.  Second, for roughly 17 years the Department of Justice has only been selectively prosecuting obscenity.  Thus, the proliferation of these materials all across society has proceeded with little hindrance.  Third, the public and members of Congress need to demand that the Department of Justice prosecute adult obscenity.  Fourth, obscenity damages the human psyche — as Prof. Mary Anne Leyden of the Univ. of Pennsylvania and several other experts discussed.   Thanks to Pat Trueman for a career of public service and for bringing DoJ’s poor performance to the attention of the public and the Congress.

Comments: - |

Video from Pornography Harms Briefing today in Washington, D.C.

by Carrie Russell
June 15, 2010

Tuesday, June 15, 2010 at the Capitol Visitors Center in Washington, D.C. Patrick A. Trueman spoke about Action Steps for Congress. For more visit PornHarms.com — see also FRC’s paper, “The Effects Of Pornography On Individuals, Marriage, Family And Community,” by Patrick F. Fagan, Ph.D.

Tags:

Comments: 4 |

A Twisted Philanthropy

by Rob Schwarzwalder
June 14, 2010

Joan Hinton was not a household name, but her work on the Manhattan project was historic. After earning her Ph.D. in physics in only two years, she was hand-picked to become a researcher on one of America’s most stunning technological achievements – the development and production of an atomic bomb.

Then she had an attack of conscience. In her obituary in today’s New York Times, she is quoted as telling National Public Radio, “I did not want to spend my life figuring out how to kill people … I wanted to figure out how to let people have a better life, not a worse life.”

So, she became a philanthropist who devoted her life to finding the cure to diseases. Well, not quite: Dr. Hinton moved to China and became a devoted Maoist Communist. I’m not making this up.

According to the Times, “For the past 40 years, she worked on a dairy farm and an agricultural station outside Beijing, tending a herd of about 200 cows.”

Did she regret her choice? Not in the least. The Times goes on to quote an interview she gave in 2008 to The Weekend Australian: “It would have been terrific if Mao had lived … Of course I was 100 percent behind everything that happened in the Cultural Revolution — it was a terrific experience.”

Just how “terrific?” Minimally one million people died during the Cultural Revolution due to persecution by the infamous Red Guards. Religious persecution was intense, and the families of “running dogs” (Chinese whose devotion to Communism was deemed insufficient) were brutalized; there are even reports of the cannibalism of young children by some Red Guards.

In total, roughly 30 million Chinese (possibly as many as 70 million) died under Mao’s reign from enforced starvation or outright murder.

Through it all, American born Dr. Hinton remained a devotee of Chairman Mao. In an interview with NBC News in 2004, journalist Catherine Rampell wrote that “Hinton gushes fervent praise for the Cultural Revolution, Mao’s mass mobilization of Chinese youth to criticize party officials, intellectuals and bourgeois values, from 1966 to 1976.” Dr. Hinton even used archaic and ludicrous Maoist language to denounce the “renegades” and “capitalist roaders” – code terms for freedom-lovers who would not fully bend the knee to Beijing’s dictators.

Dr. Hinton now faces the Judge of all the earth, not the beatific images of Mao Zedong with which she festooned her apartment. How sad. How very sad.

Comments: 1 |

Peter Sprigg testifies before the Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability

by Carrie Russell
June 11, 2010

WASHINGTON, D.C. – June 11 Family Research Council Senior Fellow Peter Sprigg
testifies before the Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability (ACBSA), urging the committee to maintain the current policy which permanently defers men who have had sex with men since 1977 as blood donors.

Read the entire written testimony here.

The ACBSA voted 9-6 against lifting the ban. For more, read today’s Washington Update and FRC’s Press Release.

Comments: 3 |