Obama Is A Vulcan, Only He’s Tuvok not Spock
by Chris Gacek
December 2, 2009
Imagine my surprise, amusement and satisfaction upon reading an Associated Press story in the Tuesday (12/1/2009) Washington Times entitled “Obama seen not unlike Mr. Spock.” You see I had been claiming that President Obama resembled a Vulcan for about a year-and-a-half – that is long before he was elected president.
The only problem with the A.P. story is that the president doesn’t resemble Spock – he resembles the Vulcan Tuvok from a later iteration of the show. (Yes, that would be the indescribably terrible Voyager. The show with Captain Janeway and Neelix — the most P.C. of all. The one with the Indian shaman. Didn’t the men wear dresses? Hide the razor blades. The memories of it are returning.)
Well, Tuvok was played by an African-American actor, Tim Russ, and Russ bears an uncanny resemblance to Mr. Obama. One eco-Trekkie agrees; go here and see Obama in Tuvok’s uniform. Or this on Facebook (“Barack Obama Is Actually Tuvok.” Yes, we have never seen both of them at the same time.)
Lorne Michaels of Saturday Night Live, give Tim Russ’s agent a call and sign him to a three-year two-month contract with a renewal option. Russ is your dead-ringer Obama impersonator, but he needs to wear the Vulcan ears when playing the President or the gag won’t work. (Lorne, it shouldn’t have taken this long to figure this one out.)
+ + +
On a more serious note, this Vulcan thing is now having political implications. So says A.P.’s Seth Borenstein who writes, “President Obama’s Spock-like qualities have started to cause him political problems in real-world Washington. Critics see him as too technocratic, too deliberative, too lacking in emotion.” No kidding. (The A.P. article appears to be an attempt to spin Obama’s bloodlessness to be a positive – a nerdy love for science. It isn’t.)
Obama’s Vulcanism seemed completely obvious to me. He’s a great orator, but he has none of the warmth of a Ronald Reagan or a Bill Clinton. They would light up a room when they entered. Obama’s different. I was always struck by images of Obama sitting next to some poor shlub in an Iowa diner at breakfast with the other guy looking like he wanted to take his pancakes and run away. No one-on-one rapport. None.
That doesn’t make someone a Vulcan, however. Unfortunately, Obama has a detached, rationalism that is incapable of projecting any empathy. Combine that with his general demeanor, and you start getting a Vulcan. Even the patrician Bush the Elder could shed a tear occasionally. One doesn’t have to go Dick Vermeil to beat the Vulcan tag, but I don’t think I have ever seen Obama come close to choking up.
The greatest example of Obama’s Vulcanism occurred when the president hosted ABC’s propagandistic Health Care Day at the White House. He told a woman whose 100+ year-old mother had a pacemaker that under his scheme her mother’s zest for life wouldn’t have gotten her the device that kept her alive. You could almost hear the utilitarian Vulcan maxim: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” “Your mother’s Death Panel does not approve of pacemaker’s for 100 year-olds.” “So, we’ll give your mother some painkillers and send her on her way to go die in Vulcan Valhalla.” (Actually, that’s a pretty close approximation of what Obama did say.)
Who knows how this will all end up, but articles like this one in the Washington Times demonstrate that the public is starting to look at Mr. Obama much differently. And the media spins on.
Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.
By: Rev Newt | December 7, 2009 at 4:26 am
Let’s look at the facts and what the president actually said.
Fact: the 100 year old’s arrhythmia specialist initially thought a pacemaker was pointless, given the age of the patient. this is generally a reasonable supposition), and also reasonably when the specialist saw the robustness of this woman, he changed his mind. This is a good example of how good health care works — specialists, GPs, and patients consulting and deciding on a sensible course. This is, by the way the approach used in Canada and Australia where doctors are free to focus on patients because they don’t have to worry about a for-profit insurance bureaucrat denying care.
Here is what our President said:
“… end-of-life care is one of the most difficult, sensitive decisions we’re going to have to make. I don’t want bureaucracies making those decisions. ”
” We often make those decisions [to treat or not treat] by just letting people run out of money or making the deductibles too high or the out-of-pocket expenses so onerous that they just can’t afford the care.
“And those kinds of decisions between doctors and patients, and making sure that our incentives are not preventing those good decisions and that the doctors and hospitals all are aligned for patient care — that’s something we can achieve. We’re not going to solve every single one of these very difficult decisions at end of life, and ultimately that’s going to be between physicians and patients. ”
“Well, and that’s a good example [the 100 year old getting the pacemaker] of where if we’ve got experts who are looking at this and they are advising doctors across the board that the pacemaker may ultimately save money, then we potentially could have done that faster. I mean, this can cut both ways.
The point is we want to use science, we want doctors and medical experts to be making decisions that all too often right now are driven by skewed policies, by outdated means of reimbursement, or by insurance companies. And everybody’s families I think have experienced this in one way or another. That’s the reason we need reform right now.
You have a problem with this reasoned, compassionate and supportive response?