FRC Statement on the Christmas Eve Passage of the Health Care ‘Reform’ Bill
by JP Duffy
December 24, 2009
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 24, 2009
CONTACT: J.P. Duffy, (202) 679-6800
Washington D.C. – This morning the United State Senate voted 60-39 in favor of final passage of HR 3590, the so-called “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins made the following comments:
“Today’s Christmas Eve vote may signal the end of the debate in the Senate, but it’s far from the end of the debate at large. Since Senator Reid’s bad bill is substantially different from the House’s bad bill, the lower chamber will have to vote on the plan again. The Senate bill’s massive funding for elective abortions and the construction of abortion facilities are among the most radical differences. On Monday, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius admitted in an interview that the Senate health care bill will force ‘everybody’ in the exchange to pay an abortion premium. The so-called Nelson ‘compromise’ ensures that everyone will pay for abortion–no matter how the funds are divided up.
“According to a new Quinnipiac poll, Americans–by a huge three to one margin–are overwhelmingly opposed to using taxpayer dollars to fund abortion. Seventy-two percent of the country is now firmly on the side of Congressman Bart Stupak’s (D-Mich.) solution to ban the government’s financial involvement in the deadly procedure. House and Senate conferees would do well to heed that warning when they come together to iron out their differences with the final bill, else this bill could collapse because of it.
“Disagreement over abortion funding is one of the many reasons this fight is far from over. Both House and Senate versions of the bill are seriously flawed. Both bills still allow rationing of health care for seniors, raise health costs for families, mandate that families purchase under threat of fines and penalties, offer counsel about assisted suicide in some states, do not offer broad conscience protections for health care workers and seek to insert the federal government into all aspects of citizen’s lives. Additionally, the bills would place a crushing debt on both current and future generations.”
-30-
Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.
By: student | February 18, 2010 at 1:56 pm
We need to give a public option to all Americans for health insurance coverage. We need to expand the Medicare system to include all Americans, regardless of whether one is offered coverage by a State or employer. The Medicare system is effective in providing comprehensive health coverage and services to Americans, albeit the system is in need of payer reform to reduce the fraudulent billing. The expansion of Medicare will impact the health insurance industry and this is the correct change for progress as health as a human right and not a commodity. The greatness of this nation is that it changes for the good of its citizens. That is when an industry becomes ineffective or obsolete, we eliminate or significantly reduce it, so that the greater good can prevail. We cannot be beholden to billion dollar companies just because they exist. We need to put the good of the people above the good of corporations. We need a comprehensive public health care coverage option, and the easiest option would be to expand Medicare to all citizens.