Cancer Declines, But Not if Robert Reich Can Help It
by Rob Schwarzwalder
December 8, 2009
The National Cancer Institute today issued it’s “Annual Report to the Nation” on cancer, and it has some good news for all Americans this Christmas season: “Rates of new diagnoses and rates of death from all cancers combined declined significantly in the most recent time period for men and women overall and for most racial and ethnic populations in the United States, according to a report from leading health and cancer organizations.”
The report goes on to state that “Cancer deaths decreased 1.6 percent per year from 2001 to 2006.”
It’s a pretty safe bet that just about everyone reading this has lost someone to cancer or knows someone fighting the disease. In its many varieties – from adenocarcinoma (cancer of the glandular system) to colorectal cancer – the disease is indiscriminate in when and whom it strikes. Cancer is one of pain’s best friends, and death’s greatest allies.
So, today’s report should encourage all of us. You can read it at the link above to learn more about why the decline has occurred. But that’s not why I’m writing about it.
If the Democratic health care plan becomes law, it is safe to assume that the sheer weight of its costs will prohibit further private-sector health research and development. Many medical firms undertake cancer research projects and seek to develop treatments to arrest and even cure the various forms of cancer.
How many of these, and how many federally-funded anti-cancer programs, will collapse as health care research dollars become scarcer?
Consider the words of former Clinton Labor Secretary and leading Democratic intellectual Robert Reich in a speech he gave at UC-Berkeley in 2007:
“This is what the truth is and a candidate will never say, but what a candidate should say … We’re going to have to, if you’re very old, we’re not going to give you all that technology and all those drugs for the last couple of years of your life to keep you maybe going for another couple of months. It’s too expensive…so we’re going to let you die.” (“Robert Reich Reveals Brutal Health Care Truths; MSM Snores,” Wall Street Journal blog, by P.J. Gladnick, Media Research Center, Oct. 13, 2009)
Without continued market-driven research and adequate federal funding, today’s good news about cancer will become little more than a cherished memory. And such funding and research will, as Robert Reich suggests, decline if Uncle Sam manages and rations health care.
Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.
Comments
You wrote: The report goes on to state that “Cancer deaths decreased 1.6 percent per year from 2001 to 2006.” Unfortunately that does not hold true for Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) patients. This insidious disease is taking the lives of our loved ones because THEY DIDN’T KNOW THE SYMPTOMS OF IBC! Won’t you please help us spread the word not only to the general public but to the medical community that you don’t have to have a lump to have breast cancer! Because IBC is the most aggressive form of breast cancer , doctors, especially in small towns, are misdiagnosing symptoms – education is needed to save lives. Early diagnosis for IBC patients is Stage IIIb; the cancer is in the dermal lymphatic system AND the treatment is always chemo first .. NOT surgery. This form of bc is NOT usually detected by a mammogram therefore the urgency of KNOWING THE SYMPTOMS. IBC does NOT usually present itself with a lump! Commonly misdiagnosed as mastitis, a benign breast disease; it can be a rash or what appears to look like an insect bite. that doesn’t dissipate with creams/salves, part of ones breast that looks like the skin of an orange .. pitted (peu d’orange), inverted nipple. Lives will be saved when everyone is aware of the symptoms of IBC. My daughter is a 12 year IBC survivor because she knew the symptoms.
Marilyn ‘Mare’ Kirschenbaum
Vice President
Inflammatory Breast Cancer Foundation
http://www.ERASEibc.com

By: Rev Newt | December 9, 2009 at 3:39 am
“How many of these, and how many federally-funded anti-cancer programs, will collapse as health care research dollars become scarcer?”
Huh?! I thought FRC didn’t want the US government providing health care. Tony, please be consistent!