<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama the Unready</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2009/11/obama-the-unready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/11/obama-the-unready/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:09:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rev ewt</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/11/obama-the-unready/comment-page-1/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev ewt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=2218#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>Well, W Bush rushed to war -- in the wrong country! I prefer a president who listens to expert views and takes time to define a strategy. Imagine if Bush had focused on Afghanistan and Pakistan and had gone after Osama bin Laden rather than attacking Iraq (?? no connection with 9/11, bin Laden, global terrorism) and digging up Saddam Hussein from his hidey-hole. Iraq created a terrible US budget deficit, killed thousands of American soldiers, harmed millions of Iraqis and &lt;em&gt;harmed&lt;/em&gt;  US political influence in the world. Strangely, FRC seems to have supported the Iraq invasion -- even though it meant letting bin Laden go free. Is this inconsistency or is it that the FRC is just a puppet of the RNC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, W Bush rushed to war &#8212; in the wrong country! I prefer a president who listens to expert views and takes time to define a strategy. Imagine if Bush had focused on Afghanistan and Pakistan and had gone after Osama bin Laden rather than attacking Iraq (?? no connection with 9/11, bin Laden, global terrorism) and digging up Saddam Hussein from his hidey-hole. Iraq created a terrible US budget deficit, killed thousands of American soldiers, harmed millions of Iraqis and <em>harmed</em>  US political influence in the world. Strangely, FRC seems to have supported the Iraq invasion &#8212; even though it meant letting bin Laden go free. Is this inconsistency or is it that the FRC is just a puppet of the RNC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
