<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama, Reason, Revelation – and Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/obama-reason-revelation-%e2%80%93-and-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/obama-reason-revelation-%e2%80%93-and-abortion/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OperationCounterstrike</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/obama-reason-revelation-%e2%80%93-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>OperationCounterstrike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=1608#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>No, God does not bestow on fetuses a right to live inside another person&#039;s body against her will.

God DOES bestow on all human beings the right to kill anyone and anything which is located inside their bodies.

What matters is not WHAT fetuses are, but WHERE they are.

If something is inside my body, then I&#039;m entitled to kill it NO MATTER WHAT IT IS.

Abortion kills a person but abortion on demand is justifiable homicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, God does not bestow on fetuses a right to live inside another person&#8217;s body against her will.</p>
<p>God DOES bestow on all human beings the right to kill anyone and anything which is located inside their bodies.</p>
<p>What matters is not WHAT fetuses are, but WHERE they are.</p>
<p>If something is inside my body, then I&#8217;m entitled to kill it NO MATTER WHAT IT IS.</p>
<p>Abortion kills a person but abortion on demand is justifiable homicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/obama-reason-revelation-%e2%80%93-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=1608#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>Maybe Obama is giving pro-life an unintended boost by national health care by ensuring pregnant uninsured women will now have insurance so they can afford to pay prenatal and delivery costs so they won&#039;t feel financially pressured to abort their baby. God works in mysterious ways</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Obama is giving pro-life an unintended boost by national health care by ensuring pregnant uninsured women will now have insurance so they can afford to pay prenatal and delivery costs so they won&#8217;t feel financially pressured to abort their baby. God works in mysterious ways</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luisa Fernanda</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/obama-reason-revelation-%e2%80%93-and-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>Luisa Fernanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=1608#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>And is the President really willing to listen to unrefutable scientific proof that the there is a human being the moment the egg is fertilized by the sperm?  If you take a DNA sample just after conception, you get results for a completely new person, whose DNA has not existed before and will never exist again.  And if you define &quot;life&quot; as independent growing and changing, who can deny that a self-directing growing being, who splits its cells and moves and grows and changes without external influence is alive?  Also, the whole &quot;my body, my choice&quot; argument has absolutely no scientific base, the minute that, not only is the baby a completely different being than the mother, but it only feeds from her, it doesn´t even mingle its blood... 
Is this the kind of universal language that he requires?  
Is he, and every other person who thinks like him, willing to let go of their own prejudices and listen to reason?  Why are only pro-lifers called bigots?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And is the President really willing to listen to unrefutable scientific proof that the there is a human being the moment the egg is fertilized by the sperm?  If you take a DNA sample just after conception, you get results for a completely new person, whose DNA has not existed before and will never exist again.  And if you define &#8220;life&#8221; as independent growing and changing, who can deny that a self-directing growing being, who splits its cells and moves and grows and changes without external influence is alive?  Also, the whole &#8220;my body, my choice&#8221; argument has absolutely no scientific base, the minute that, not only is the baby a completely different being than the mother, but it only feeds from her, it doesn´t even mingle its blood&#8230;<br />
Is this the kind of universal language that he requires?<br />
Is he, and every other person who thinks like him, willing to let go of their own prejudices and listen to reason?  Why are only pro-lifers called bigots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

