<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New NIH Director</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/new-nih-director/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/new-nih-director/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:23:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/new-nih-director/comment-page-1/#comment-1933</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=1602#comment-1933</guid>
		<description>Robert, are you responding to the commentary or to Dr. Collins&#039; initiative. The commentary says that Dr. Collins is helping to promote initiatives that use embryos (excess and cloned) to do research on the use of embryonic stem for medical treatment, and that by doing that, he rejects a Christian world view that values life from conception. It also makes the point that many successful treatments have resulted from research on adult stem cells. In other words, why take money from successful adult stem cell research and put it into the risky (and morally objectionable) embryonic stem cell research. If that is what you are saying, I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, are you responding to the commentary or to Dr. Collins&#8217; initiative. The commentary says that Dr. Collins is helping to promote initiatives that use embryos (excess and cloned) to do research on the use of embryonic stem for medical treatment, and that by doing that, he rejects a Christian world view that values life from conception. It also makes the point that many successful treatments have resulted from research on adult stem cells. In other words, why take money from successful adult stem cell research and put it into the risky (and morally objectionable) embryonic stem cell research. If that is what you are saying, I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Searcy</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/08/new-nih-director/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Searcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frcblog.com/?p=1602#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confessed, are you headed in the wrong direction. Adult stem cell therapy seem to work much better than embryonic. What is the reasoning behind this decision. Are you putting all our eggs in the wrong basket.

Robert Searcy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confessed, are you headed in the wrong direction. Adult stem cell therapy seem to work much better than embryonic. What is the reasoning behind this decision. Are you putting all our eggs in the wrong basket.</p>
<p>Robert Searcy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
