Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

New NIH Director

by David Prentice
August 19, 2009

FrancisCollins2Dr. Francis Collins has now been sworn in as the new Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), following his confirmation by the Senate and no confirmation hearings. In early interviews, Dr. Collins has laid out five main themes for NIH, and has noted that setting up a new human embryonic stem cell registry will be a high priority. An emphasis on human embryonic stem cells is expected, since Collins helped President Obama develop his new policy on embryonic stem cells. Dr. Collins supports use of “excess” human embryos, as well as cloning of human embryos for experiments, despite the fact that the scientific evidence shows that embryonic stem cells are not suited to treating patients, while adult stem cells continue to help thousands of patients for an ever-increasing variety of disorders.

While some questioned his nomination based on his religious beliefs, Collins was also quick to point out that he had no “religious agenda”. Of course, that should have been self-evident. Saying that one is a devout evangelical Christian while promoting embryo and cloning experiments, is a bit akin to claiming to be a devout Druid while promoting clear-cutting of forests.


Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.

Comments

By: Robert Searcy | August 24, 2009 at 1:05 pm

I’m confessed, are you headed in the wrong direction. Adult stem cell therapy seem to work much better than embryonic. What is the reasoning behind this decision. Are you putting all our eggs in the wrong basket.

Robert Searcy

By: Arizona | October 7, 2009 at 11:08 pm

Robert, are you responding to the commentary or to Dr. Collins’ initiative. The commentary says that Dr. Collins is helping to promote initiatives that use embryos (excess and cloned) to do research on the use of embryonic stem for medical treatment, and that by doing that, he rejects a Christian world view that values life from conception. It also makes the point that many successful treatments have resulted from research on adult stem cells. In other words, why take money from successful adult stem cell research and put it into the risky (and morally objectionable) embryonic stem cell research. If that is what you are saying, I agree.

Write a comment






Currently you have JavaScript disabled. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.