Death is cheaper than life…
by Krystle Weeks
August 4, 2009
Patients deemed “terminally ill” by the state of Oregon are getting the sense that death is cheaper than saving their lives. Since Oregon offers a state-run health care plan, those who are terminally ill have been told that their treatments have been denied, but that they would be covered for assisted suicide.
Fox News aired a series called “America’s Future,” which is looking at the challenges we face in the 21st Century. One series featured a man from Oregon, who was denied chemotherapy treatment and was offered physician assisted suicide instead.
“Oregon doesn’t cover life-prolonging treatment unless there is better than a 5 percent chance it will help the patients live for five more years — but it covers doctor-assisted suicide, defining it as a means of providing comfort, no different from hospice care or pain medication.
“It’s chilling when you think about it,” said Dr. William Toffler, a professor of family medicine at Oregon Health & Science University. “It absolutely conveys to the patient that continued living isn’t worthwhile.”
According to KATU, another cancer patient from Oregon shares a similar story, as she was being denied coverage for Tarceva, a powerful chemotherapy drug. Oregon’s health care plan offered her physician assisted suicide as well.
Since Oregon’s health care plan was created 15 years ago, this was prior to the advent of new life saving medicines. Instead of prolonging the life of a terminally ill cancer patient, Oregon is now sentencing them to death by denying coverage. If President Obama’s health care plan is passed, this will be the same message that millions across the country could be hearing.
Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.
Comments
[...] obama’s handpicked bureaucratic panel of appointees. keep in mind, to a small degree, this is already happening in oregon where i live, for those who are on The Oregon Health Plan. and the results? controversial [...]
Either Anthony missed the point or he’d make a great member of Obama’s Relative Effectiveness Research team. If it was you or your parents, you wouldn’t want the government deciding life or death. And if you have a 5% chance of surviving and living a productive life, do want an accountant making that decision?
Apparently N Waff missed Anthony’s point.

By: Anthony | August 5, 2009 at 4:59 pm
Oregon is hardly sentencing them to death. They have cancer and Oregon is unwilling to pay a huge amount of money on a change to save someone that will most likely die. Resources are limited. If Oregon pays for this medicine, what must they give up to afford it? What if the money was used to save a child’s life, or the life of someone who will live 30 more years? God has a plan for each persons life, and if you are unhappy with how many years he has given you blaiming government health care isn’t going to help.