<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where can we find eHarmony &#8220;Classic&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2009/04/where-can-we-find-eharmony-classic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/04/where-can-we-find-eharmony-classic/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sporto</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/04/where-can-we-find-eharmony-classic/comment-page-1/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>sporto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=987#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>If eHarmony would have been a Christian only, church based, word of mouth type of dating service, it&#039;s possible that they may not have put themselves in a position to cater to the militant homosexuals.  Neil Clark Warren put himself and his company in that position for advertising on Primetime TV and everywhere he could to capitalize on his dating business. Who was eHarmony competing against that they had to advertise so much on television.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If eHarmony would have been a Christian only, church based, word of mouth type of dating service, it&#8217;s possible that they may not have put themselves in a position to cater to the militant homosexuals.  Neil Clark Warren put himself and his company in that position for advertising on Primetime TV and everywhere he could to capitalize on his dating business. Who was eHarmony competing against that they had to advertise so much on television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2009/04/where-can-we-find-eharmony-classic/comment-page-1/#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=987#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>Same situation here.  I signed up for eHarmony in 2002 due to it&#039;s mention on a Focus on the Family program.  It was more expensive than the alternatives, but the women I met through the service were, without exception, strong Christian women with hearts that longed for Christ.  I eventually met my wife through eHarmony, and for a couple of years afterward, we recommended it to every single person we knew.

But that was then, this is now.  Due to their apparent shift in philosophy - first due to their articles about hooking up and planning for one night stands, and now capitulating to the gay lobby - we can no longer recommend them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same situation here.  I signed up for eHarmony in 2002 due to it&#8217;s mention on a Focus on the Family program.  It was more expensive than the alternatives, but the women I met through the service were, without exception, strong Christian women with hearts that longed for Christ.  I eventually met my wife through eHarmony, and for a couple of years afterward, we recommended it to every single person we knew.</p>
<p>But that was then, this is now.  Due to their apparent shift in philosophy &#8211; first due to their articles about hooking up and planning for one night stands, and now capitulating to the gay lobby &#8211; we can no longer recommend them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
