Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

Month: February, 2009

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
February 12, 2009

Here’s what we are reading today.

|

What’s the big deal about stem cells?

by Jared Bridges
February 12, 2009

If you’ve ever been confused about the national debate over stem cell research, you’re not alone.  Politicians, preachers, and pedestrians alike are likely to be confused, given the vague rhetoric that’s often thrown about. 

For a good primer on the debate, and to learn about the difference between adult and embryonic stem cells, which ones are ethical and which were not — or which is truly yielding successful treatments,  tune in today at 11:00 a.m. EST for the live webcast of a lecture by FRC’s Dr. David Prentice.  In ”The Audacity of Hype: Embryonic Stem Cells — Wasting Taxpayer Lives and Wasting Taxpayer Dollars,” Dr. Prentice examines “the real facts on the science and the difference between hype and hope” in the stem cell debate.

View the webcast here.

|

Lincoln and Darwin: Trans-Atlantic Twins?

by Robert Morrison
February 12, 2009

“The heavens declare the glory of God; the firmament sheweth his handiwork.” Thus saith the Lord. Not necessarily, saith George Will. Washington’s leading smart man notes today’s two hundredth anniversary of Lincoln’s birth with a useful explanation of what Darwin taught. Darwin was born on the same day that Lincoln was born. Historian John Lukacs calls such coincidences spiritual puns. There are some secularists who are trying to make Lincoln and Darwin trans-Atlantic twins, suggesting somehow that just as Lincoln liberated the slaves, so Darwin freed us from religious dogma and catechesis through his writings on the origins of dogs and cats-and us.

Will notes that Darwin “had no intellectual room for a directing deity that wills a special destination for our species.” Darwin, Will points out, “placed humanity in a continuum of all protoplasm.” How elevating.

Will rejects Intelligent Design. “The fact of order in nature does not require us to postulate a divine Orderer.” But is it reasonable for us to rule that divine Orderer out of order?

Continue reading »

|

Blogosphere Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
February 11, 2009

Here’s some of the buzz from the blogosphere.

|

That 78-cent Bogus Bill

by Robert Morrison
February 11, 2009

With great fanfare, President Barack Obama last week signed his first bill.  The White House was the backdrop for a celebratory East Room signing ceremony.  The bill, backers acknowledge, “overrules a Supreme Court ruling.” The subject was a favorite of feminists: equal pay for equal work.  Now, the sight of a roomful of liberals cheering when Congress and the President overrule the Supreme Court ought to make any of us happy.  But I wish the President had not repeated that old feminist line:  women make just seventy-eight cents to every one dollar men make. 

The fact is true, but it is also misleading.  Liberals claim that it is because of job discrimination that women are relatively disadvantaged.  This is not the case.  The reason that the average woman earns 78% of the what the average man earns is because the average woman spends part of her adult life outside of the paid workforce or working only part-time (generally while bearing and raising children), whereas the average man works full-time for all or nearly all of his adult life. And there is no injustice in paying workers (whether male or female) more money when they have more work experience.

Continue reading »

|

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
February 11, 2009

Here’s what we are reading today.

|

That “Muslim World” Formulation

by Robert Morrison
February 10, 2009

President Obama gave his first interview to the Al Arabiya television network. He talked of a new U.S. effort to reach out to “the Muslim world.” He’s hardly the first one to use that phrase. Think tank director John Esposito of Georgetown University regularly speaks of the Muslim world.

Question: What would be the reaction from the pundits and the talking heads if the President spoke of the U.S. reaching out to Christendom? That word used to describe the collection of countries in which Christianity predominated. You can well imagine. He would be denounced immediately as a theocrat. The very idea of Christian countries offends the cultured despisers of religion. Or, at least it offends the despisers of some religions.

Continue reading »

|

Blogosphere Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
February 10, 2009

Here’s some buzz from the blogosphere.

|

Intact Families Trump X-Rated Movies

by Michael Leaser
February 10, 2009

In the latest Mapping America, the General Social Survey shows that adults who lived with both biological parents as adolescents are less likely to have watched an X-rated movie in the last year.

|

Change Watch Backgrounder: Carol Browner

by Tom McClusky
February 10, 2009

POSITION: ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT FOR ENERGY & CLIMATE CHANGE

(Energy and Environment Czar, new position created by President Obama to coordinate energy and climate policy regulations)

NOMINEE: Carol M. Browner

BIRTH DATE: December 16, 1955 in Miami, FL

EDUCATION:

B.A. in English 1977, University of Florida, Gainesville

J.D. 1979; University of Florida College of Law

Continue reading »

|

Planned Parenthood: deliverer of the undelivered

by Chuck Donovan
February 10, 2009

Planned Parenthood, the nation’s premier supplier of birth control, is also the nation’s top deliverer of the undelivered – human lives that are ended by induced abortion. The chart below shows the regular, decades-long increase in abortions carried out in the U.S. by the agency that styles itself as focused on reducing the “need” for abortion.

Planned Parenthood abortions 1973-2006

Planned Parenthood has doubled its abortion count (and the figures exclude early abortions carried out through abortifacient means in the first minutes or days after conception) in the last 13 years alone. Federal (taxpayer) money for the group has also grown during this period. Money to Planned Parenthood is apparently a “stimulus” affording the group more access to women who are abortion vulnerable.

UPDATE: Todd, a commenter below, asks a good question: what is the source of these figures? Answer: they are published yearly in Planned Parenthood’s own annual reports.

Comments: 3 |

Change Watch Backgrounder: Lisa Jackson

by Tom McClusky
February 10, 2009

POSITION: ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NOMINEE: Lisa P. Jackson

BIRTH DATE: February 8, 1962 in Philadelphia, PA; adopted a few weeks later and raised in New Orleans, LA

EDUCATION:

Master’s in Chemical Engineering 1986, Princeton

Bachelor’s Chemical Engineering summa cum laude 1983, Tulane

Continue reading »

|

Blogs 4 Life 2009–Chris Gacek, Ph.D. and Dr. Martha Shuping

by Krystle Weeks
February 10, 2009

Blogs 4 Life 2009–22 Weeks

by Krystle Weeks
February 10, 2009

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
February 10, 2009

Here’s what we are reading today.

|

Stimulost Update

by Tom McClusky
February 9, 2009

The substitute “compromise” made cloture* tonight with a vote of 61-36. Beyond the Terrible Trio (Senators Collins (R-Me.), Snowe (R-Me.) and Arlen Specter (R-Penn.)) no Republicans voted for the measure. No Democrats voted against cloture. Senator Cornyn (R-Tex.) missed the vote, but one can safely assume he would have voted against it, and Senator Gregg abstained because he is going to be the next Commerce Secretary (I am assuming he is getting a head start on abstaining from all fiscal responsibility for the next four years.)

From the Senate: “Under the previous order, at 12:00pm tomorrow (Tuesday), the bill will be subject to another 60 vote hurdle by either waiving a budget point of order (if it is raised) or a 60 vote threshold on the amendment. If the amendment is agreed to, the Senate will then proceed to final passage of the Stimulus bill.

Majority Leader Reid also said this evening that additional votes on Executive Nominations may occur tomorrow.”

I’ve talked to several offices and between this and the David Ogden nomination Senate offices are getting swamped with phone calls – so keep them coming. It inspires those on our side and sends a strong message to those who are not.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a new estimate tonight on the “compromise.” CBO estimates that the package will cost $838.2 billion (not including interest which puts it over a trillion dollars). This is $18.7 billion more than the House-passed bill.

I also updated the greatest quotes (HERE) with the help of some FRC and Senate staffers.

*Cloture is the process by which debate can be limited in the Senate without unanimous consent. When invoked by roll call vote – three-fifths of those present and voting – it limits each senator to one hour of debate.

|

About that “Extra Mile.”

by Robert Morrison
February 9, 2009

I joined about 200 people yesterday in Annapolis for a re-tracing of President Lincoln’s February, 1865, walk. He came to Maryland’s capital only once–to catch a ship to steam down the Chesapeake Bay. He went there to discuss peace terms with Confederate commissioners at Fortress Monroe. Annapolis’ Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission was determined to make a great event of Lincoln’s brief encounter with our town. Lincoln had to get off his special one-car train at the depot and walk across town to the Naval Academy to embark on his short sea voyage.

The handsome tribute booklet published by our Maryland State Archives titles Lincoln’s sojourn “The Extra Mile.” They tell us everything we could want to know about his cross-town walk except where they got the phrase the extra mile.  It comes from the Bible. Jesus tells us we should “walk the extra mile” when required to go one mile. In Jesus’ time, Roman soldiers could force Israelites to carry their heavy armor and gear one full mile. Jesus wanted us to do more than what was minimally required of us.

This fine booklet is another example of what the late Prof. E.D. Hirsch wrote on cultural literacy. Hirsch believed that we could not be culturally literate without a working knowledge of the Bible. I don’t know if Hirsch believed the Bible, but he certainly understood its influence on our culture. He cited India as an example. That giant nation has more than 450 language groups. Only the English language unites the people of India, and only the Bible enables them to understand the language they use.

President Lincoln was literally walking the extra mile for peace. He knew that the peacemakers are blessed. Lincoln had read the Sermon on the Mount. His trip was a spur-of-the-moment thing. He slipped out of the Executive Mansion without his faithful secretary John Nicolay even knowing he was gone. General Grant had persuaded the President that he was needed at Fort Monroe. Even if the Confederates’ peace offerings were unacceptable-and so they ultimately proved to be-Lincoln needed to show his own Union soldiers that he would spare no effort to bring peace.

So Lincoln strode purposefully through Annapolis, a distance of 1 ΒΌ miles. He passed by the Union soldiers’ hospital at St. John’s College on his left. As well, he passed the Old State House on his right.  The Maryland legislature was in session then, debating ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery. Lincoln worked hard to get Congress to approve the Thirteenth Amendment. Lincoln went so far as to sign the Thirteenth Amendment, even though the President’s signature is not required for a constitutional amendment.

Our little town of Annapolis made the most of Lincoln’s briefest of walk-throughs. They did a fine job. We learned who carried Lincoln’s toothbrush and the fact that he always got seasick. But if the program organizers had noted the origins of that beautiful phrase, “the extra mile,” they might have given us a better insight into the Great Emancipator’s heart. 

Comments: 1 |

Blogosphere Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
February 9, 2009

Here’s some of today’s buzz from the blogosphere.

  • “So I Guess the FOCA Is Off The Table Then?,” E.M. Zanotti, American Princess Blog Is FOCA dead after Barack Obama said, “We know there is no God who condones the killing of an innocent human being,” during last week’s prayer breakfast? I don’t know, but Obama’s actions might speak louder than words.
  • “Virginia senators Warner and Webb: Anti-religious bigots?,” Kat, CatHouse Chat With all of this talk about the Stimulus legislation (which will be voted on at 5:30 p.m. tonight), it is a shame that these Senators (and others) did not step up and vote on behalf of religious liberty by supporting Sen. Jim DeMint’s amendment, which would have granted students to meet anywhere on campus for prayer meetings.
  • “Christian Thinking Bad Thoughts,” LaShawn Barber, LaShawn Barber’s Corner Here is a really good response to the recent story in Miami about an abortion clinic throwing away a live baby.

|

Blogs 4 Life 2009–Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.

by Krystle Weeks
February 9, 2009

The Bells of Britain

by Robert Morrison
February 9, 2009

My wife and I took our teenage children to London ten years ago. We tried to get in to Westminster Abbey for Easter sunrise service, but England’s ancient church was filled to overflowing. So we darted in to the smaller, more accommodating St. Margaret’s Chapel next door. Following a powerful resurrection sermon, we stepped out to be greeted by the booming bells of the Abbey. We could not hear the vicar’s Easter greeting for the din. We could not hear one another’s voices as the pealing of the Abbey bells was so thunderous. With a motion of my head, our family trooped off, marching a mile away before we could speak and be heard.

Those bells are the voice of Britain’s past. In 1940, they were silenced by order of Prime Minister Winston Churchill. With the daily threat of German invasion, no church bells sounded in the island fortress for three years. Church bells ringing during the Battle of Britain would have signaled Hitler’s landing. Only with the defeat of Rommel’s Afrika Korps at El Alamein in November, 1942-where “the glint of victory” reflected off their soldiers’ helmets-did the church bells of Britain joyfully ring forth.

Britain’s Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali returned to that theme of church bells during his recent visit to Washington. The Pakistani-born prelate was asked whether Muslim muezzins should be permitted to call the faithful to prayer in British cities. “Certainly,” the Anglican leader said, “as soon as church bells ring out in Mecca.” Bishop Nazir-Ali came to sound an alarm-but for a different kind of invasion. He said Britain’s national existence is menaced by a cringing Establishment. Britain is a Christian culture supported by centuries of English law. Both of these elements are being undermined by a quiet surrender to the demands of political correctness and relentless Muslim pressure.

Should Britain expel the Muslims already there? Should Britain cut off future Muslim immigration? No, the Bishop replied. As Christians, Britons have a duty to welcome the alien, a duty to show him hospitality and not contempt.

“The European Union is all for human rights,” he said, “but they are unwilling to say where human rights come from.” They come, he maintains, from the Judeo-Christian ethic. Jews and Christians believe that we are made in the image and likeness of God. Thus, we are endowed with our fundamental human dignity. It is from this source, and not from the Koran, that we derive our laws.

To Bishop Nazir-Ali, the Archbishop of Canterbury’s acceptance of Muslim shari’ah law probably reflects the opinion of the Britain’s deracinated elites, the Establishment. Nazir-Ali said that many times, Muslim women who are coerced into so-called cousin marriages plead for help from the police. In their distress, they are handed over to Muslim police officers, who simply return them to the very families that threaten them with death. “All people in Britain must have access to British law,” Nazir-Ali firmly said.

London is now the center of international Muslim investment, fueled by petro-dollars. The power of that moneyed interest is driving many government decisions.

There is something else at work here. The secularists in Britain and Europe can give no reason why humans should have rights. They cannot say that one culture recognizes human dignity and another crushes it. Their cringing before Muslim threats only encourages more concession. Already, there are vast areas of British and European cities where the police fear to go.

In lands where Islam has predominated, the status of Christians and Jews has been clear for centuries. They are tolerated at best, but subordinated. They are called dhimmis. This Arabic word is often translated as “second-class citizen,” but it is hardly that. It is best understood as a caste system to which the dhimmis are consigned-and to which they are forced to consent. In this caste system, dhimmis are forever marked with the badges of servitude-legal and spiritual inferiority.

The very enlightened secularists of Britain, Europe and the U.S. still hold nominal power. Increasingly, however, they use that power to give way, to salaam, before the daily growing power of their demanding guests. While holding temporary sway, these cringing elitists can best be described as dhimmicrats-empowered only to be impotent.

Listening to Bishop Nazir-Ali-who has received death threats for his fearless Christian witness-you have to wonder why the rest of the Church of England clergy are not standing up and speaking out–or at least ringing their church bells.

|