Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

Month: January, 2009

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
January 13, 2009

Here’s what we are reading this morning:

|

Evening Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
January 12, 2009

Here is what we are reading this evening:

|

Obama May Need Environmental Waivers for Spending

by Chris Gacek
January 12, 2009

A recent Los Angeles Times article makes clear that President Obama’s enormous stimulus/spending plan may run into a huge GREEN roadblock – the nation’s environmental laws and, in particular, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).  NEPA was signed into law on January 1, 1970, and as Wikipedia puts it: “NEPA’s most significant effect was to set up procedural requirements for all federal government agencies to prepare Environmental Assessments (EAs) and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs). EAs and EISs contain statements of the environmental effects of proposed federal agency actions.”  If significant environmental effects are found, the government has to propose adequate ways of mitigating the harms to be caused by the project.  Spending vast sums on construction, roadway, and other infrastructure projects are certainly going trigger NEPA reviews. 

To spur jobs Governor Schwazenegger is attempting to clear environmental hurdles to various road projects that he believes “would give the state a $1.2 billion economic boost and create 22,000 jobs over the next three years.” The Governator wants to bypass environmental objections to get the projects moving.  In doing so, he “has infuriated the Sierra Club and other groups with such proposals and with a letter he sent to President-elect Barack Obama last week asking that federal environmental reviews be waived on the highway projects.” (my emphasis)

As I read this, Schawarzenegger wants the Obama administration to waive the NEPA requirements.  California’s request here is understandable, and if President Obama wants his stimulus explosion to effect the economy quickly, the Congress, the president, and the primary federal agencies for each “action” may need to waive these laws.  Otherwise, each project could get bogged down.  As Schwarzenegger noted, ” ‘What is important here is not to have projects ready [ ] three years from now, which can happen with the environmental approvals and other kind of red tape that you go through.’”

Having some familiarity with NEPA and related laws, I was beginning to wonder how its requirements were going to be met if the Obama Administration decided to seek a crash building & spending program.  Well, the article from California makes it abundantly clear that environmental regulation of the stimulus spending is going to be a real problem that the Congress will probably have to address statutorily.

Comments: 1 |

Change Watch Backgrounder: Susan Rice

by Tom McClusky
January 12, 2009

POSTION:U.S AMBASSADOR TO THE UNITED NATIONS

NOMINEE: Susan Rice

Born: Washington, DC. November 17, 1964

Family: Husband,  Ian O. Cameron, and two children.

Occupation: Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy, Global Economy and Development at the Brookings Institute

Education: D.Phil. (1990), M.Phil. (1988), Oxford University; B.A., Stanford University, 1986

Clinton White House: Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs (1997-2001); Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for African Affairs, the National Security Council, the White House (1995-1997); Director for International Organizations and Peacekeeping, National Security Council (1993-1995)

Abortion

“Various interest groups and lawmakers issued statements today reacting to Barack Obama’s six-person national security team. Three advocacy groups for women weighed in positively on the three female nominees: Sen. Hillary Clinton, Dr. Susan Rice and AZ Gov. Janet Napolitano: Planned Parenthood’s Cecile Richards, National Organization for Women president Kim Gandy and Emily’s List’s Ellen Malcolm.”

“Throughout her extensive career in international affairs, Susan Rice has consistently affirmed the responsibility to address the burdens of poverty around the globe and their impact on global health. In addition, she understands the important role the United Nations plays in promoting and protecting women’s health around the world, especially in developing countries. Susan Rice is a passionate and committed advocate for poor women and families around the world. We expect that she will work effectively with other countries to fulfill the UN’s development agenda, including the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) on maternal health, gender equality and AIDS reduction.” – Planned Parenthood’s Cecile Richards.

“Reproductive health (abortion) is clearly and openly mentioned in the MDGs as a critical component of improving maternal health globally. The fifth of eight Millennium Development Goals is to improve maternal health. Two targets make up that goal: reduce by 3/4 the maternal mortality rate; and, according to the United Nations site about the MDG campaign, ‘achieve universal access to reproductive health care.’ This target clearly states, ‘an unmet need for family planning undermines achievement of several other goals.’”  [source]

Genocide

“At an interagency teleconference in late April, Susan Rice, a rising star on the NSC who worked under Richard Clarke, stunned a few of the officials present when she asked, ‘If we use the word ‘genocide’ and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November [congressional] election?’ Lieutenant Colonel Tony Marley remembers the incredulity of his colleagues at the State Department. ‘We could believe that people would wonder that,’ he says, ‘but not that they would actually voice it.’ Rice does not recall the incident but concedes, ‘If I said it, it was completely inappropriate, as well as irrelevant.’” Power, Samantha. “Bystanders to Genocide.” The Atlantic September 2001.

History demonstrates that there is one language Khartoum understands: the credible threat or use of force. After Sept. 11, 2001, when President Bush issued a warning to states that harbor terrorists, Sudan — recalling the 1998 U.S. airstrike on Khartoum — suddenly began cooperating on counterterrorism. It’s time to get tough with Sudan again . . .After swift diplomatic consultations, the United States should press for a U.N. resolution that issues Sudan an ultimatum: accept unconditional deployment of the U.N. force within one week or face military consequences. The resolution would authorize enforcement by U.N. member states, collectively or individually. International military pressure would continue until Sudan relented. . . If the United States fails to gain U.N. support, we should act without it. Impossible? No, the United States acted without U.N. blessing in 1999 in Kosovo to confront a lesser humanitarian crisis (perhaps 10,000 killed) and a more formidable adversary.” Rice, Susan, Lake, Anthony and Payne, Donald. “We Saved Europeans. Why Not Africans?The Washington Post. October 2, 2006. 

On Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY), nominee for Secretary of State, her potential counterpart at the State Department

“On MSNBC’s “Tucker” yesterday, one of Sen. Barack Obama’s top foreign policy aides, former assistant secretary of state for African Affairs Susan Rice, said of Clinton’s 3 am phone call TV ad, ‘Clinton hasn’t had to answer the phone at three o’clock in the morning and yet she attacked Barack Obama for not being ready. They’re both not ready to have that 3 am phone call.’”  [source]

Miscellaneous

“During Bill Clinton’s second term, Rice played a major role in the decision to refuse Sudan’s offer to hand over Bin Laden. According to Richard Miniter, author of Losing bin Laden, Rice persuaded Sandy Berger to turn Sudan down because she doubted its credibility and was offended by its human rights violations. But our ambassador to Sudan argued far more sensibly for calling Khartoum’s ‘bluff.’ Mansoor Ijaz, who was involved in the negotiations with Sudan provides the same account. No doubt, Rice will urge Obama (in the unlikely event he needs urging) to rush into talks with Iran and Syria notwithstanding any reservations about their credibility and human rights records, on the theory of ‘why not; how can it hurt?’ But when offered the opportunity to take out the world’s leading terrorist — as opposed to appeasing rogue terrorist supporting states — Rice drew the line.” [source]

|

Judge Lederman’s Top Ten List: Bad Arguments for Homosexual Parenting

by Peter Sprigg
January 12, 2009

After seven years of working on the issue of homosexuality at the Family Research Council, I think I have a pretty good sense of the arguments that pro-homosexual activists use in support of their agenda, such as affirmation of homosexual parents and same-sex “marriage.” Even when those arguments are made well, they are unconvincing-but when they are made poorly, it just leaves me shaking my head.

One example of this phenomenon-bad arguments made badly-got a lot of attention recently. That was the Newsweek cover story on “The Religious Case for Gay Marriage,” penned by the magazine’s religion editor Lisa Miller. It was so poorly researched and poorly reasoned that Miller should lose her job for it-not because she is in error, but because she is incompetent. Some political writer posting on a blog might get away with the kind of sloppiness Miller showed-but a “religion editor” writing a cover story should not be allowed to. Family Research Council President Tony Perkins and I wrote in detail about the Newsweek story on December 9.

Continue reading »

|

SCHEDULED HEARING DATES

by Tom McClusky
January 9, 2009

Here are coronation hearing dates for some of President-elect Obama’s nominees. For more details such as times please go here. To watch the hearings as they are happening tune into CSPAN.org

Tom Daschle, nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services
Hearing date: January 8th, 2009
Location: Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee

Hilda L. Solis, nominee for Secretary of Labor
Hearing date: January 9th, 2009
Location: Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee

Hillary Rodham Clinton, nominee for Secretary of State
Hearing date: January 13th, 2009
Location: Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Steven Chu, nominee for Secretary of Energy
Hearing date: January 13th, 2009
Location: Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Arne Duncan, nominee for Secretary of Education
Hearing date: January 13th, 2009
Location: Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee

Peter R. Orszag, nominee for Director of the Office of Management and Budget;
Robert L. Nabors II, nominee for Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
Hearing date: January 13th, 2009
Location: Senate Budget Committee

Shaun Donovan, nominee for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Hearing date: January 13th, 2009
Location: Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee

Thomas J. Vilsack, nominee for Secretary of Agriculture.
Hearing date: January 14th, 2009
Location: Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee

Lisa P. Jackson nominee for Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; Nancy Helen Sutley, nominee for Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality. Hearing date: January 14th, 2009
Location: Senate Environment and Public Works Committee

Eric Shinseki, nominee for Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Hearing date: January 14th, 2009
Location: Senate Veterans Affairs Committee

Peter R. Orszag, nominee for Director of the Office of Management and Budget;
Robert L. Nabors II, nominee for Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
Hearing date: January 14th, 2009
Location: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

Ken Salazar, nominee for Secretary of the Interior.
Hearing date: January 15th, 2009
Location: Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Susan E. Rice, nominee for Representative to the United Nations
Hearing date: January 15th, 2009
Location: Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Eric H. Holder, nominee for Attorney General of the United States
Hearing date: January 15th, 2009
Location: Senate Judiciary Committee

Mary Schapiro, nominee for Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission; Christina Romer, nominee for Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors;
Austan Goolsbee and Cecilia Rouse, nominees to be Members of the Council of Economic Advisors;
and Daniel Tarullo, nominee to be a Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Hearing date: January 15th, 2009
Location: Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee

Janet A. Napolitano, nominee for Secretary of Homeland Security
Hearing date: January 15th, 2009
Location: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

|

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
January 9, 2009

Here’s what we’re looking at today

Comments: 1 |

Change Watch Backgrounder: Arne Duncan

by David Nammo
January 8, 2009

ARNE DUNCAN

POSITION: Secretary of Education

BIRTH DATE: Nov. 6, 1964

EDUCATION:  Magna Cum Laude, Harvard University, Sociology Degree, 1987

FAMILY:  Wife, Karen (Australian-American) and two children.

EXPERIENCE:  Arne Duncan was born and raised in the Hyde Park, Chicago area.  He attended University of Chicago Laboratory Schools.  He was accepted to Harvard University, where he was co-captain of Harvard’s basketball team and was named a first team Academic All-American.  Mr. Duncan played professional basketball in Australia after graduation from 1987-1991, where he also worked with children who were wards of the state.

Duncan moved back to Chicago in 1992  and directed the Ariel Education Initiative, a program to enhance educational opportunities for students on Chicago’s South Side.  In 1998, he began working for the Chicago Public Schools and in 2001, Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley named Duncan as the Chief Executive Officer. 

[source]

No Child Left Behind

Duncan has called for more flexibility in the No Child Left Behind school accountability law, but does not intend to scrap the initiative entirely.
[source]

Gay High School

Arne Duncan approved a proposed gay-friendly Chicago Social Justice High School – Pride Campus.  The school would have been committed to affirming homosexuality in adolescents, have been publicly subsidized and included homosexuality-affirming curricula.  

[source]

Comprehensive Sex Education & Playboy

Chicago Public Schools adopted a comprehensive sex education curricula called passed the Family Life and Comprehensive Sexual Health Education policy in 2006, under Arne Duncan’s leadership.  The policy was crafted in coordination with the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health, according to the Windy City Times, a pro-homosexual website.   

The Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health, a leading group promoting comprehensive sex education, held its Spring 2006 fundraiser at the Playboy mansion.

“Comprehensive sex education” is education-speak for sex education curricula that, among other things, teach students subversive views of sexual conduct, abortion, and homosexuality. Here are some of the topics covered in typical comprehensive sex ed curricula:

  • Provides values-based education and offers students the opportunity to explore and define their individual values as well as the values of their families and communities
  • Includes a wide variety of sexuality related topics, such as human development, relationships, interpersonal skills, sexual expression, sexual health, and society and culture
  • Includes accurate, factual information on abortion, masturbation, and sexual orientation
  • Provides positive messages about sexuality and sexual expression, including the benefits of abstinence
  • Teaches that proper use of latex condoms, along with water-based lubricants, can greatly reduce, but not eliminate, the risk of unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including HIV
  • Teaches that religious values can play an important role in an individual’s decisions about sexual expression; offers students the opportunity to explore their own and their family’s religious values
  • Teaches that a woman faced with an unintended pregnancy has options: carrying the pregnancy to term and raising the baby, or carrying the pregnancy to term and placing the baby for adoption, or ending the pregnancy with an abortion

[source]

Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC)

Duncan worked in promoting the Annenberg Challenge, a radical education group formerly run by Barack Obama and Bill Ayers.   The CAC’s agenda flowed from Mr. Ayers’s educational philosophy, which called for infusing students and their parents with a radical political commitment, and which downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism.

[source 1, source 2]

Charter and Failing Schools

Duncan has earned praises from some quarters for his support of charter schools, his willingness to close failing schools, his support for greater student accountability, and his promotion of merit pay for teachers.

[source]

Record of Success

During Duncan’s tenure at Chicago Public Schools, the system spent the second highest amount per individual student in the nation yet only showed a very small improvement improved test scores.

[source]

|

Evening Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
January 8, 2009

Here’s what we’re looking at tonight:

|

Tales of Chemical Abortion in the New York Times

by Chris Gacek
January 8, 2009

 

On January 5, 2009, the New York Times carried an article (“For Privacy’s Sake, Taking Risks to End Pregnancy” by Jennifer R. Lee and Cara Buckley) describing the fact that many Dominican women in New York City are aborting using the anti-ulcer drug, misoprostol (Cytotec®).  Misoprostol is also the second drug in the FDA-approved abortion regimen of mifepristone (RU-486 or Mifeprex®) and misoprostol.  Using misoprostol alone is a practice that is widely found in Latin American nations because misoprostol is cheap and available in pharmacies while mifepristone is either expensive, restricted in distribution, or both.  (From some quick web research: RU-486 does not appear to be approved in many Latin American nations; it isn’t even approved in Canada.)

Access to RU-486 is tightly controlled in the United States, but misoprostol is sold in drug stores as an anti-ulcer medication for people who take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS).  In New York City “women can obtain the pills either through pharmacies that are willing to bend the rules and provide the medicine without a prescription or by having the drugs shipped from overseas.”

The RU-486 regimen was developed so that mifepristone could chemically end the pregnancy’s development while relying on misoprostol to then bring about the violent uterine contractions needed to expel the “products of conception.”  With misoprostol-only abortions the mifepristone-related chemical action does not occur, and abortions, like those reported in the article, depend primarily on termination based on contractions and expulsion.  Because of the dual action, RU-486 abortions are more effective than misoprostol-only abortions, but even they fail 3-5% of the time.

To their credit, Lee and Buckley do note that misoprostol abortions have “side effects” that “can be serious, and include rupture of the uterus, severe bleeding and shock.”  The article also quotes a doctor who has studied misoprostol abortions in New York City where “he saw a lot of Dominican immigrants with incomplete abortions in the emergency room.” 

Of course, this is the pattern that we at FRC, along with doctors from the American Association of Pro Life Ob/Gyns (“AAPLOG”), have observed.  We analyzed RU-486 adverse event reports obtained from the FDA via the Freedom of Information Act.  Many chemical abortions do not complete themselves and women are forced to seek out emergency room care while they are tremendously sick.  Blood loss can be significant sometimes requiring transfusions.

Instead of portraying these abortions as events that end the life of a human being while abusing the bodies of the women who have them, chemical abortions are portrayed in a benign light in the article.  But the reality is much different. 

For more on RU-486 abortions and the drug’s U.S. approval, download Politicized Science: The Manipulated Approval of RU-486 and Its Dangers to Women’s Health.

Comments: 2 |

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
January 8, 2009

Here’s what we’re looking at today:

|

FRC’s Tom McClusky: for better or worse

by Jared Bridges
January 7, 2009

Reacting to Tom’s post yesterday on Obama Attorney General nominee Thomas J. Perrelli, sportscaster Keith Olbermann (wasn’t he great in his ESPN days?) last night gave our own Tom McClusky the dubious honor of World’s (third) Worst Person:

 

Perhaps Mr. Olbermann is unaware that FRC is not “James Dobson’s lobbying arm” (we’ve been an independent non-profit since 1992), but around the office, we’re wondering if Tom was slighted a bit?

Is it more or less of an honor to come in third to Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin?

Comments: 4 |

“From Crayons to Condoms:” Another Glimpse into America’s failing Public Schools

by Krystle Weeks
January 7, 2009

Over the Christmas break, there were several books waiting for my attention. Among the books, I chose to read was “From Crayons to Condoms: The Ugly Truth about America’s Public Schools.” This book definitely looked like it would provide some insights on what is being taught in public education. However, upon reading the book, I was appalled to read the stories from parents, students and teachers about the curriculum being taught in schools across the country, which seemed to provide a barrage of sex, promiscuity, lessons on being gay or lesbian, grotesque violence and talking about feelings.

As a public school graduate, I received a quality education that provided a strong background for college preparation without hearing any liberal propaganda being taught by my teachers. However, there are students all over America who subject to the leftist curriculum by either reading pornographic material or listening to an openly gay couple describe the discrimination they face because of their full-blown AIDS.

The book, which featured open accounts from concerned parents, students and teachers, also featured a section about what parents can do to improve the current state of public education. Suggestions include: reviewing what your child is reading for class, not signing any permission forms, and checking out the curriculum.

“From Crayons to Condoms” was written by Steve Baldwin, a former California state legislator and Karen Holgate, who is an advocate for education reform. I strongly urge every parent, who has a student in public schools, to read this book and to become active in their child’s education. In a society where education is crucial, it is better for a student to learn in an environment that is not infiltrated with liberal propaganda.

Comments: 1 |

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
January 7, 2009

Here’s what we’re looking at today:

“More on Warren,” Hendrik Hertzberg, The New Yorker (January 6, 2009)

“Voting Record of Health Secretary Nominee Daschle Largely Pro-Abortion,” Matthew Hadro, CNSNews.com (January 7, 2009)

“Invest in Abortion,” David Freddoso, National Review (January 7, 2009)

“8 Traits of Teens Who Abstain From Sex,” Bernadine Healy, M.D., U.S. News & World Report (January 7, 2009)

“ACLU to churches: Not on school grounds, you don’t,” Drew Zahn, WorldNetDaily (January 6, 2009)

“Atheists Annoyed by Inaugural Oath,” David Waters, The Washington Post (January 5, 2009)

“Pro-life pivot,” Marvin Olasky, World Magazine (January 17, 2009)

|

Change Watch Backgrounder: Thomas J. Perrelli

by Tom McClusky
January 6, 2009

POSTION: ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL

NOMINEE: Thomas J. Perrelli

Born: March 12, 1966

Occupation: Managing Partner of Jenner & Block’s Washington, DC office.

Education: graduated from Harvard Law School, magna cum laude, in 1991

Clinton White House: In 1997, served as counsel to Attorney General Janet Reno. He subsequently rose to Deputy Assistant Attorney General, supervising the Federal Programs Branch of the Civil Division, which represents virtually every federal agency in complex civil litigation. Perrelli also supervised the Justice Department’s Tobacco Litigation Team in its litigation against the major cigarette manufacturers.

End of Life issues

“An attorney who won an award for representing Terri Schiavo’s husband Michael in his efforts to kill his disabled wife is now an advisor to the transition team of incoming president Barack Obama.

Thomas Perrelli, who raised over $500,000 for the pro-abortion presidential candidate and is the managing partner of a Washington law firm, Jenner & Block LLP, is helping advise Obama on putting together a Justice Department team.

However, Perrelli provided Michael Schiavo with legal advice during his response to the Congressional bill that President Bush signed allowing the Schindler family to take their lawsuit seeking to prevent Terri’s euthanasia death from state to federal courts.

Perrelli led the Jenner & Block team that developed the legal briefs opposing appeals for Michael and he ultimately received the Albert E. Jenner, Jr. Pro Bono Award in October 2006 for representing Terri’s former husband at no cost.

On Michael’s legal team, Perrelli worked with infamous pro-euthanasia attorney George Felos as well as lawyers from the Florida chapter of the ACLU.” 

[source]

Redistricting

Background: “The 2010 midterm elections and the resulting battles over redistricting will shape the future of both political parties. A case challenging the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) is being offered to the Supreme Court, highlighting these political stakes. And President-elect Barack Obama’s Justice Department is about to take center stage in this fight. The Constitution requires legislative districts be redrawn after each decennial national census. The 2010 midterm elections will determine the makeup of all 50 state legislatures. With few exceptions, these legislatures will then draw new lines of all congressional districts, as well as many state legislative districts, for the 2012 election and beyond. A major factor in this redistricting is the Voting Rights Act. A number of VRA’s provisions apply nationwide, originally designed to protect the right of African Americans to vote. But another provision of the law has been challenged in a case that has now been offered to the U.S. Supreme Court. Section Five of the VRA requires certain jurisdictions with a history of egregious racism to go through a special process before they can make any changes affecting voting. Under Section Five, these jurisdictions must get pre-clearance from the U.S. Justice Department before they can redistrict or make any other changes to their election laws or procedures, or get a three-judge panel of the federal district court in D.C. to sign off on the jurisdiction’s plan. The law requires the Justice Department or the federal court to determine whether the changes would have either the purpose or the effect of abridging the right to vote.”  Blackwell, Ken. ”Obama Justice.” Washington Times  Dec. 31, 2008.

“Mr. Perrelli, a former Justice Department official and Harvard Law School classmate of Mr. Obama’s, helped raise $500,000 for the president-elect’s campaign, has worked as an attorney for the recording industry, which has significant business before the Justice Department, and represented Democratic lawmakers and voters involved in politically charged redistricting cases, an issue certain to rise again with the 2010 census.” Dinan, Stephen. “Obama’s Justice Picks Draws Ire of Pro-lifers.” Jan. 6, 2009.

Miscellaneous

Close friendship with President-elect Obama

“At Harvard, (Cassandra) Butts was moot court partners with Perrelli, who first met Obama at the dinner party and served as his managing editor on the Harvard Law Review. Perrelli, a Washington lawyer who had never been a fundraiser, would go on to collect more than $500,000 for Obama’s presidential campaign. He is now part of the Department of Justice transition team. 

‘We have all been friends together, and we found a common enterprise through Barack,’ Perrelli said. Perrelli occupied seat 151 of professor Laurence Tribe’s constitutional law class in the fall 1989 semester – just a few feet away from Obama (seat 26) and two others who would prove vital to his ambitions: Julius Genachowski (93) and Michael Froman (103).”

[source]

|

Church + Married Parents = Very Happy Marriages

by Michael Leaser
January 6, 2009

In the latest Mapping America, federal surveys show that those who are currently very happily married were more likely, as adolescents, to attend religious services at least monthly and to live with both biological parents.

|

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
January 6, 2009

Here’s what we’re looking at today.

“Obama Nominates Four To Senior Justice Posts,” Carrie Johnson and Robert Barnes, The Washington Post (January 6, 2009)

“Church vandalism heats up gay marriage debate,” Jessica Garrison, The Los Angeles Times (January 5, 2009)

“Less than 10% believe abortion should be legal, unfettered,” Charlie Butts, OneNewsNow (January 6, 2009)

“Embryonic Stem Cell Research Funding Backers Likely to Use Obama, Congress,” Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com (January 5, 2009)

“Maitland-based Liberty Counsel advances views on religious freedom through the courts,” Satta Sarmah, Orlando Sentinel (January 5, 2009)

“USCIRF: Religious liberty in Iraq marked by ‘severe abuses’,” Tom Strode, Christian Examiner (January 6, 2009)

|

Viacom-Time Warner Cable Cut Deal for Price Increases

by Chris Gacek
January 5, 2009

Last week, cable giant Time Warner “negotiated” a deal to keep showing Viacom’s channels after December 31, 2008.  As a Los Angeles Times article indicated the companies were battling hard with Viacom threatening to turn off kid’s shows to get their money:

“Viacom had purchased newspaper advertisements, featuring a tearful Dora the Explorer, and placed an on-screen crawl on its channels to alert viewers to the impending programming blackout. The ads encouraged viewers to complain to Time Warner Cable.”

“The tactic worked — parents reported having to soothe children who were upset over the prospect of not being able to watch their favorite shows on Nickelodeon, including ‘SpongeBob SquarePants.’” 

Emotional blackmailers of children – in which circle of Hell did Dante place such scoundrels?  Not a pleasant one I’ll bet.

Well, of course, Time Warner capitulated and agreed to a 12% increase for the Viacom channels.  Under the old agreement, for example, Viacom received about 32 cents per subscriber per month from cable operators for MTV.  If you didn’t want MTV – tough.  Time Warner carries Viacom channels into 13.3 million houses, so one-third of a dollar per month per subscriber ain’t chicken feed.

Unfortunately, the mechanism to protect consumers from such price increases, manipulation of children, and unwanted purchases of cable channels is not in place.  What would that be?  It is having the power to refuse to purchase and pay for cable channels. 

This episode points to the need for consumer choice in cable TV channel selection.  If cable subscribers had that power – - SpongeBob SquarePants would probably be the one who would need some serious consolation right now after many adults turned him off and pocketed the change.

Comments: 2 |

Change Watch Backgrounder: Gov. Janet Napolitano – UPDATED

by Connie Mackey
January 5, 2009

POSITION:  UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY

NOMINEE:  Janet Napolitano

Born: New York City, November 29, 1957

Occupation:  Governor of Arizona  – elected in 2002 and again in 2006

Education: Santa Clara University and law degree from University of Virginia

Political Career:  While a partner in the Phoenix law firm Lewis and Roca LLP, Napolitano served as attorney for Anita Hill when Hill testified against the Supreme Court nomination of Clarence Thomas.  Appointed by President Bill Clinton as U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona, she then ran for and won the position of Arizona Attorney General in 1998 where she focused on consumer protection issues and general law enforcement.

Abortion:  ”I am committed to women’s reproductive rights.  Current protections must not be eroded, and we must continue to fight to provide Arizona women with the support they need in making decisions about their own bodies.  Thus, I am pro-choice.”

Campaign web site, www.GoJanet.org , “Issues” Sep 9, 2002

Napolitano vetoed every piece of abortion legislation that came across her desk – seven pro-life measures in total including a partial-birth abortion ban as well as a bill to strengthen parental consent requirements.  She refused to sign measures to make sure taxpayer funds do not pay for abortions for state workers.  As Governor she vetoed a bill that would allow women to know that an unborn baby will feel pain during an abortion procedure.  She vetoed a bill in 2004 that would have allowed women to receive information about abortion’s risk and alternatives that abortion businesses sometimes withhold from women considering abortions.  In addition, she vetoed a measure that would have protected pro-life pharmacists from being forced to dispense drugs that could cause abortions.

Appointment of Judges:  “Governor Napolitano defends appointment of judges even though the system never throws anyone out.” “Governor Napolitano is quoted in the Yellow Sheet defending the system of merit selection in Arizona’s larger counties, which allows the governor to appoint judges instead of requiring them to run for election.  They are only required to run for re-election, but it’s impossible to vote them out at that point since they have no name recognition from having never run a real campaign.”….”It is impossible to get rid of bad judges with merit selection, and the governor is able to appoint her political flacks like former legislator Bill Brotherton who has little relevant legal experience; his background consists mainly of Democrat political activism.  Three of Napolitano’s 15 or so judicial appointments have been gay, considering this (20%) is significantly higher than the proportion of gays in the general population, it is clear that Napolitano is able to pursue her own political agenda in the appointment of judges.  Instead of getting judgeships based on real merit, political leftists are able to get judgeships based on their leftwing ideological connections to Napolitano.” [source]

Napolitano’s Appointees:  As Governor, Janet Napolitano has embedded pro-gay rights and pro-abortion activists throughout her administration.  One example is Bryan Howard, who was appointed as a member of the governor’s Commission on the Health Status of Women and Families.  The Planned Parenthood Federation of America awarded Howard their highest honor for leadership for his role as CEO of Planned Parenthood of Arizona.  In his acceptance speech, he said the following: “I am proud of what I have accomplished and how we’ve accomplished it.  I am proud that more mothers and babies survive the perils of pregnancy.  I am proud that more families celebrate a new addition rather than regret it.  And I am proud we are helping more young people to experience their sexuality in a healthy, thoughtful way, whether they are gay, straight, bisexual or transgendered.”  According to the Planned Parenthood account, Howard’s “advocacy on behalf of reproductive rights has led to significant progress for women and families in Arizona, including Governor Janet Napolitano’s rejection of federal abstinence-only funding.” [source]

Law enforcement:  As Secretary of Homeland Security the Governor’s future performance can best be judged by her record on the issue of immigration in a border state.  She used her veto power on some key bills to cut benefits for and the flow of illegal aliens into the state.  Some of those bills included one denying in-state tuition and day care for illegal aliens and one allowing local authorities to enforce immigration law.  She vetoed a bill making English the official state language. She went directly up against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s successful border operations and developed a new task force headed by the Department of Public Safety concentrating on illegal felons with outstanding warrants.  Her mantra in dealing with the illegal immigration problems in her border state has been, “Security and immigration are the federal government’s responsibility.”

‘While she has complied with allowing the border fence to be built, she has been unenthusiastic about its success.  Last year, Ms. Napolitano reached a deal with Mr. Chertoff to make driver’s licenses more secure under a federal program known as REAL ID, but in June she signed a bill refusing to put the standards in place, calling the program an unfinanced federal mandate.  She was a vocal critic when Congress failed to pass legislation last year revamping immigration law and has also backed proposals favored by some immigrant advocacy groups, including a temporary worker program and ‘a strict and stringent pathway to citizenship’ for illegal immigrants already here that would include learning English and paying fines.  But last year she also signed into law sanctions against employers who knowingly hire illegal workers and later complained when the Bush administration withdrew the bulk of the National Guard from the Mexican border earlier this year, as it had planned.”  Randal C. Archibold, New York Times, November 20, 2008

 

Defending Marriage: Gov. Janet Napolitano of Arizona announced her opposition this week to a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, according to The Arizona Republic. While Napolitano made it clear that she believes marriage is a union between a man and a woman, she is not in favor of the proposal and finds it unnecessary at this time. Napolitano said, “I don’t think the constitutional amendment is necessary. The voters of Arizona will have a chance to decide this. Personally, I’m going to oppose it. We already have a statute that defines marriage. The courts have already said the statute is constitutional(The Advocate) .”

 

Miscellaneous: In 1991, Janet Napolitano, then a well-regarded partner in the law firm of Lewis & Roca, LLP, served as the attorney for law professor Anita Hill when Hill testified against U.S. Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas.  USLiberals.com

|

Daily Buzz

by Krystle Weeks
January 5, 2009

Here’s what we’re looking at today:

“For Privacy’s Sake, Taking Risks to End Pregnancy,” Jennifer Lee and Cara Buckley, New York Times (January 4, 2009)

“If This Isn’t Slavery, What Is?,” Nicholas D. Kristof, New York Times (January 3, 2009)

“Broken promises: Knowledge can help protect teens,” Editorial, The Salt Lake Tribune (January 4, 2009)

“Mohler: Newsweek ‘biblical case for gay marriage’ falls flat,” Jeff Robinson, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Towers (January 5, 2009)

“Walk for Life West Coast Launches Post-Abortion Billboard, Pro-Life March Coming,” Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com (January 2, 2009)

“Still Fighting,” Russ Pulliam, World Magazine (January 17, 2009)

“Conservatives back Blackwell as RNC chief,” Ralph Z. Hallow, The Washington Times (January 5, 2009)

“Girls Need a Dad and Boys Need a Mom,” Janice Shaw Crouse, Townhall.com (January 5, 2009)

|