<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FRC Responding to Newsweek Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2008/12/frc-responding-to-newsweek-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/12/frc-responding-to-newsweek-bias/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/12/frc-responding-to-newsweek-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=705#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>&quot;That fundamental understanding regarding marriage is reflected by the 29 states that have passed constitutional amendments and the additional 15 states that have passed laws defining marriage as between a man and a woman.&quot;

This is not a &quot;fundamental understanding&quot;, it is the bleeding edge of the gay-bashing society we live in.  The proof that it&#039;s not fundamental are the three state Supreme Courts who have found gays have the right to marry:  Massachusetts, Connecticut and California. (CA citizens will have to re-establish that right after they expose the outside influences, e.g., Mormon church, that contributed to  Prop 8)  New Jersey may be next.

The first truth you need to accept is that gay people are born that way, they are a product of nature just like left handed people or twins, and they have little choice in the matter.

Gay bashing is this century&#039;s equivalent of racism in the last century.  It took a long time to make racism obvious and abhorrent, and the same will happen to gay bashing.  In another hundred years gay marriage will be common and of no concern to any but the most ignorant or narrow-minded.

Sam


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That fundamental understanding regarding marriage is reflected by the 29 states that have passed constitutional amendments and the additional 15 states that have passed laws defining marriage as between a man and a woman.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not a &#8220;fundamental understanding&#8221;, it is the bleeding edge of the gay-bashing society we live in.  The proof that it&#8217;s not fundamental are the three state Supreme Courts who have found gays have the right to marry:  Massachusetts, Connecticut and California. (CA citizens will have to re-establish that right after they expose the outside influences, e.g., Mormon church, that contributed to  Prop 8)  New Jersey may be next.</p>
<p>The first truth you need to accept is that gay people are born that way, they are a product of nature just like left handed people or twins, and they have little choice in the matter.</p>
<p>Gay bashing is this century&#8217;s equivalent of racism in the last century.  It took a long time to make racism obvious and abhorrent, and the same will happen to gay bashing.  In another hundred years gay marriage will be common and of no concern to any but the most ignorant or narrow-minded.</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secular Heretic</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/12/frc-responding-to-newsweek-bias/comment-page-1/#comment-1321</link>
		<dc:creator>Secular Heretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=705#comment-1321</guid>
		<description>Good letter.

I doubt that they would publish it. Only biblicly illiterate people would buy into their article anyway and those who want to change its message.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good letter.</p>
<p>I doubt that they would publish it. Only biblicly illiterate people would buy into their article anyway and those who want to change its message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

