Comments on: Homosexual TV Characters — Proportional Representation, or Propaganda? http://www.frcblog.com/2008/10/homosexual-tv-characters-proportional-representation-or-propaganda/ The Blog of Family Research Council Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:28:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Suricou Raven http://www.frcblog.com/2008/10/homosexual-tv-characters-proportional-representation-or-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-1214 Suricou Raven Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:56:07 +0000 http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=626#comment-1214 Hollywood is not in the business of being accurate. People don't want accurate. They want to escape from reality. They'll put in whatever characters best reflect in the TV ratings. If they create any contriversy, it will be quite deliberate in order to attract viewers. Hollywood is not in the business of being accurate. People don’t want accurate. They want to escape from reality.

They’ll put in whatever characters best reflect in the TV ratings. If they create any contriversy, it will be quite deliberate in order to attract viewers.

]]> By: Dusty Fohs http://www.frcblog.com/2008/10/homosexual-tv-characters-proportional-representation-or-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-1213 Dusty Fohs Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:44:18 +0000 http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=626#comment-1213 I'm rather shocked at this post. If a story on TV has nothing to do with sexual promiscuity, STDs, mental illness, substance abuse, domestic violence, and child sexual abuse, then why in the world would it be reflected in a program regardless of who the characters are? Besides, those topics are HARDLY reserved for homosexuals. I mean really... domestic violence? Child sexual abuse? The reason there are more homosexuals on TV than evangelical Christians is because homosexuals for the most part are nice, happy people, and they make for pleasant and often comical television. After reading this post, I don't believe I could say the same for evangelical Christians unless the role called for someone filled with ignorance and a dark heart. I’m rather shocked at this post. If a story on TV has nothing to do with sexual promiscuity, STDs, mental illness, substance abuse, domestic violence, and child sexual abuse, then why in the world would it be reflected in a program regardless of who the characters are? Besides, those topics are HARDLY reserved for homosexuals. I mean really… domestic violence? Child sexual abuse?

The reason there are more homosexuals on TV than evangelical Christians is because homosexuals for the most part are nice, happy people, and they make for pleasant and often comical television.

After reading this post, I don’t believe I could say the same for evangelical Christians unless the role called for someone filled with ignorance and a dark heart.

]]>