Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

Capital Gains Loses

by Brittany Smith
October 21, 2008

Fourteen middle schools around D.C. have recently implemented a new program called Capital Gains along with New York and Chicago city schools. The program was designed by Harvard economist and researcher Roland Fryer to increase incentive for low income students to do their work and attend school. Hence, the reason why Harvard is covering half the cost of the $2.7 million dollar project, and the District has to pay the rest.

The D.C. students that are participating in the program have the potential to earn up to $100 a month for doing things like their homework, having a good attendance record and getting good grades.

But it begs the question, why pay people to do something they are required to do? Is paying them actually going to help students learn things like responsibility, hard work and duty? And what about the other middle schoolers in the District that go to school, turn their homework in on time and study without getting a paycheck? It seems that monetary incentive is telling these kids that they aren’t capable of learning on their own, that they have to be tricked into submission and into learning. It sends kids the message that doing the right thing has a price tag and isn’t something that should just be expected.

But of course the students like getting money, who wouldn’t want to get paid to go to school? When Christopher Johnson from Kelly-Miller Middle School was asked about getting paid he said, “People ain’t had money. It’s better now for people to have money than not having money.”

And while there have been no reports of the results of this program yet, it would seem that the money they are paying kids to go to school might be better spent on improving their grammar.

 For more info check out: http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=76165&catid=158


Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.

Comments

By: Laura | October 22, 2008 at 10:15 am

Middle class and affluent families offer these kinds of incentives (and much bigger ones) to their kids for doing well in school ALL THE TIME. This program explores whether similar incentives might make a difference for lower-income kids. With DC spending something between $15-20K per pupil and having approximately a 50% graduation rate, it seems like a small investment (of private dollars) to see if this could help more kids to succeed in school. We’re losing generations of kids and our country is suffering for it. Maybe these kids don’t feel school is for them. Maybe their parents are uninvolved or academically unprepared themselves to support their kids with schoolwork. My husband works in an inner-city high school where he has lots of kids who have problems at home you and I can’t imagine wrestling with. Many of them have to work to help their families get by. Some of them are being raised by single, drug-addicted parents. Anything we can do to get these kids focused on their education and able to succeed in school is worth trying because all the “conventional” solutions aren’t solving this crisis. If it doesn’t work, get rid of the program, but what if it DOES work?