<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside the Brain of Homosexual Activists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2008/06/inside-the-brain-of-homosexual-activists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/06/inside-the-brain-of-homosexual-activists/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/06/inside-the-brain-of-homosexual-activists/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=442#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>How can you call yourselves Christians? How can you judge others when the bible tells you &quot;judge not, lest ye be judged.&quot; None of you have the right to do that. I have faced discrimination all through out my life by people like you, people who claim to love thy neighbor (as long as they are straight), and live the life of a christian. I feel it is my personal duty to ensure that in a country where there is SEPERATION of church and state there will be same-sex unions and marriage. We do not have to use the bibles definition of marriage, because our laws are not supposed to be based on the bible. If you feel like it is your personal duty to persecute someone you don&#039;t even know based on your interpretation of manipulated scripture that is your right, but know that there will always ALWAYS be people pushing to have true equality in this country.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you call yourselves Christians? How can you judge others when the bible tells you &#8220;judge not, lest ye be judged.&#8221; None of you have the right to do that. I have faced discrimination all through out my life by people like you, people who claim to love thy neighbor (as long as they are straight), and live the life of a christian. I feel it is my personal duty to ensure that in a country where there is SEPERATION of church and state there will be same-sex unions and marriage. We do not have to use the bibles definition of marriage, because our laws are not supposed to be based on the bible. If you feel like it is your personal duty to persecute someone you don&#8217;t even know based on your interpretation of manipulated scripture that is your right, but know that there will always ALWAYS be people pushing to have true equality in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Siegel</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/06/inside-the-brain-of-homosexual-activists/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=442#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>If the FRC had been around in the early 1900&#039;s they would have been using the same scare tactics to prevent women from obtaining voting rights as they use on the same-sex marriage issue.  In the early 1900&#039;s many &quot;Christians&quot; said that granting voting rights to women would shatter the very foundation of society because it would give women authority over men in contradiction of biblical laws.  If Victoria Cobb of the Family Foundation (Virginia&#039;s FRC policy partner) had lived in the time of our Founding Fathers, the only thing she could have realistically hoped to be the director of would have been her own kitchen.  You people would be more at home in the time of the Puritans than you are in this modern age.  They were extremists then and you are now.  By the way, I&#039;m still waiting for you to show me the data that proves that same-sex marriage in Massachusetts is destroying society in that state.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the FRC had been around in the early 1900&#8242;s they would have been using the same scare tactics to prevent women from obtaining voting rights as they use on the same-sex marriage issue.  In the early 1900&#8242;s many &#8220;Christians&#8221; said that granting voting rights to women would shatter the very foundation of society because it would give women authority over men in contradiction of biblical laws.  If Victoria Cobb of the Family Foundation (Virginia&#8217;s FRC policy partner) had lived in the time of our Founding Fathers, the only thing she could have realistically hoped to be the director of would have been her own kitchen.  You people would be more at home in the time of the Puritans than you are in this modern age.  They were extremists then and you are now.  By the way, I&#8217;m still waiting for you to show me the data that proves that same-sex marriage in Massachusetts is destroying society in that state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/06/inside-the-brain-of-homosexual-activists/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=442#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Does any of this matter in the slightest? I think everyone reading this agrees that conservatives would oppose homosexuality whatever it&#039;s cause. Even if it were somehow shown to be purely deterministic, they would just point to their ex-gay programs (Carefully not bringing up the subject of the failure rate) as proof that gay people must fight their nature.

Studies like this are interesting from a scientific perspective, but in politics they are meaningless.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does any of this matter in the slightest? I think everyone reading this agrees that conservatives would oppose homosexuality whatever it&#8217;s cause. Even if it were somehow shown to be purely deterministic, they would just point to their ex-gay programs (Carefully not bringing up the subject of the failure rate) as proof that gay people must fight their nature.</p>
<p>Studies like this are interesting from a scientific perspective, but in politics they are meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

