Comments on: Student to appeal ban on criticizing homosexuality http://www.frcblog.com/2008/05/student-to-appeal-ban-on-criticizing-homosexuality/ The Blog of Family Research Council Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:28:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: p2 http://www.frcblog.com/2008/05/student-to-appeal-ban-on-criticizing-homosexuality/comment-page-1/#comment-993 p2 Sun, 18 May 2008 18:03:30 +0000 http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=431#comment-993 That's because the student was committing a hate crime — not a civil argument. WAKE UP! That’s because the student was committing a hate crime — not a civil argument. WAKE UP!

]]> By: Rod http://www.frcblog.com/2008/05/student-to-appeal-ban-on-criticizing-homosexuality/comment-page-1/#comment-992 Rod Sat, 17 May 2008 22:43:10 +0000 http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=431#comment-992 What is all the fuss about HOMOSEXUALITY! Did NOT GOD Create EVERYTHING? IS NOT GOD OMNI POTENT? Then GOD HAS HAD A HAND IN CREATING HOMOSEXUALS! PERIOD! What is all the fuss about HOMOSEXUALITY!

Did NOT GOD Create EVERYTHING?
IS NOT GOD OMNI POTENT?

Then GOD HAS HAD A HAND IN CREATING HOMOSEXUALS!

PERIOD!

]]> By: Pat http://www.frcblog.com/2008/05/student-to-appeal-ban-on-criticizing-homosexuality/comment-page-1/#comment-991 Pat Wed, 14 May 2008 00:11:38 +0000 http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=431#comment-991 I don't think it's statistical distortion when the Center for Disease Control reports that AIDS is primarily spread in the gay community. Why is God said so a bad argument? What are your arguments that homosexual behavior is wonderful and should be promoted. What is your argument for expression of objection based on moral beliefs is wrong. I don’t think it’s statistical distortion when the Center for Disease Control reports that AIDS is primarily spread in the gay community. Why is God said so a bad argument? What are your arguments that homosexual behavior is wonderful and should be promoted. What is your argument for expression of objection based on moral beliefs is wrong.

]]> By: daniel rotter http://www.frcblog.com/2008/05/student-to-appeal-ban-on-criticizing-homosexuality/comment-page-1/#comment-990 daniel rotter Sun, 11 May 2008 12:43:44 +0000 http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=431#comment-990 Suricou, the "Homosexual activity is harmful to health" argument isn't valid at all. The statement implies that homosexuality in and of itself is harmful. That's not true, it's homosexual promiscuity that is harmful to health (and the same thing applies, of course, to heterosexual promiscuity). Suricou, the “Homosexual activity is harmful to health” argument isn’t valid at all. The statement implies that homosexuality in and of itself is harmful. That’s not true, it’s homosexual promiscuity that is harmful to health (and the same thing applies, of course, to heterosexual promiscuity).

]]> By: barney http://www.frcblog.com/2008/05/student-to-appeal-ban-on-criticizing-homosexuality/comment-page-1/#comment-989 barney Sat, 10 May 2008 10:06:45 +0000 http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=431#comment-989 Though perhaps not obvious to a citizen from the U.K. the American Constitutional liberty of free speech is a strongly embraced virtue. This liberty is why we have equal legal footing for verbal speech( as well as the printed word) that support or disagree with our government, AND for those opinions which may be not in the majority, but of a minority of public opionion. In the case of homosexual sex, males who choose to participate in this activity have a significantly higher rate infectious abcesses requireing medical treatment of antibiotics. The particular physical attribute leading to this reality is that that the male "waste" orifice used for male homosexual sex, is not nearly as ideal as the female sex organ due to the delicate structure in the male. Irregardless of the anatomical facts produced, the bottom line conclusion is that "free speech" is a endeared American liberty and censoring an individuals right is prohibited except in the cases of directly producing harm to others...This is why if you visit the US you will see a multitude of independant news agencys instead of a solo state sponsored BBC best regards and cheers Though perhaps not obvious to a citizen from the U.K. the American Constitutional liberty of free speech is a strongly embraced virtue. This liberty is why we have equal legal footing for verbal speech( as well as the printed word) that support or disagree with our government, AND for those opinions which may be not in the majority, but of a minority of public opionion.
In the case of homosexual sex, males who choose to participate in this activity have a significantly higher rate infectious abcesses requireing medical treatment of antibiotics. The particular physical attribute leading to this reality is that that the male “waste” orifice used for male homosexual sex, is not nearly as ideal as the female sex organ due to the delicate structure in the male.

Irregardless of the anatomical facts produced, the bottom line conclusion is that “free speech” is a endeared American liberty and censoring an individuals right is prohibited except in the cases of directly producing harm to others…This is why if you visit the US you will see a multitude of independant news agencys instead of a solo state sponsored BBC
best regards
and cheers

]]> By: Suricou Raven http://www.frcblog.com/2008/05/student-to-appeal-ban-on-criticizing-homosexuality/comment-page-1/#comment-988 Suricou Raven Sat, 03 May 2008 12:28:17 +0000 http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=431#comment-988 I would be more concerned if I had ever seen a single good argument that homosexuality is immoral. I see a lot of bad ones, ranging from 'God said so, that settles it' to the laughably bad 'if everyone was gay, humanity would be extinct' to the infuriating 'gays are a danger to children.' There is even the almost-valid 'Homosexual activity is harmful to health,' which would be acceptable if not based on statistical distortions and lies. So far though, I havn't seen a single good argument. I would be more concerned if I had ever seen a single good argument that homosexuality is immoral. I see a lot of bad ones, ranging from ‘God said so, that settles it’ to the laughably bad ‘if everyone was gay, humanity would be extinct’ to the infuriating ‘gays are a danger to children.’ There is even the almost-valid ‘Homosexual activity is harmful to health,’ which would be acceptable if not based on statistical distortions and lies. So far though, I havn’t seen a single good argument.

]]>