<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mighty Quin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2008/04/the-mighty-quin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/04/the-mighty-quin/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/04/the-mighty-quin/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=425#comment-978</guid>
		<description>&quot;Isn’t there some minimal qualitative level to which a piece of “art” must attain – or pretend to attain – before a grandiose term like “censorship” can be applied to said program’s eradication ?&quot;

Even if this is true, who would you trust to make the classification? That is a position of too much power to be entrusted to anyone.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Isn’t there some minimal qualitative level to which a piece of “art” must attain – or pretend to attain – before a grandiose term like “censorship” can be applied to said program’s eradication ?&#8221;</p>
<p>Even if this is true, who would you trust to make the classification? That is a position of too much power to be entrusted to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel rotter</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2008/04/the-mighty-quin/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel rotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 06:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=425#comment-977</guid>
		<description>&quot;...the level of indecency, vulgarity, and nastiness on TV...&quot;

Is Hillyer talking about Bill O&#039;Reilly (on his TV show, he called Neal Gabler a &quot;rabid dog&quot;), Pat Robertson (on The 700 Club, he called for a nuclear bomb to be placed inside the State Department), Rush Limbaugh (on his long-defunct TV show, he implied that a then-13-year-old Chelsea Clinton looked like a dog), or Chris Matthew&#039;s Hardball (in which conservative radio host Michael Graham said that Hillary Clinton&#039;s  voice made him want to beat her with a tire iron.  The supposedly &quot;liberally-biased&quot; Matthews did not object to Graham&#039;s words).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the level of indecency, vulgarity, and nastiness on TV&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Is Hillyer talking about Bill O&#8217;Reilly (on his TV show, he called Neal Gabler a &#8220;rabid dog&#8221;), Pat Robertson (on The 700 Club, he called for a nuclear bomb to be placed inside the State Department), Rush Limbaugh (on his long-defunct TV show, he implied that a then-13-year-old Chelsea Clinton looked like a dog), or Chris Matthew&#8217;s Hardball (in which conservative radio host Michael Graham said that Hillary Clinton&#8217;s  voice made him want to beat her with a tire iron.  The supposedly &#8220;liberally-biased&#8221; Matthews did not object to Graham&#8217;s words).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

