Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

The Failure of the Condom Culture

by Moira Gaul
March 17, 2008

Last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National STD Prevention conference presented research showing that 1 in 4 teen girls (or 3.2 million) have a sexually transmitted infection (STI). In addition, findings from two studies presented demonstrate that of young women receiving contraceptives, over half are not receiving appropriate counseling, screening, and treatment for STIs.

Taken together, these findings represent a simmering STD epidemic among our young people and a tremendous negligence in care for girls most at risk for contracting STDs. The call for an effective public health prevention strategy could not be more urgent. The current contraceptive-based education approach offered in 75 percent of U.S. schools not only relies on an overly narrow focus on physical health that is spurring an epidemic, but it also completely ignores the emotional consequences of premarital sex. Abstinence education is increasingly providing an efficacious and holistic approach to protect our young people’s current and future health.

While the proponents of comprehensive or contraceptive-based sex education and much of the medical and public health community continue to pay lip service to prevention for our young people, these CDC results offer fresh evidence that the focus is on facilitating high-risk behavior rather than true primary and even secondary prevention. The risk-avoidance or sexual abstinence-until-marriage strategy must be adopted to help reverse the STD epidemic. It’s an evidence-based approach with proven results for reversing the HIV/AIDS trends in several African countries–let’s give it a chance in this country.

(See also the FRC Press release: “New STD Data Shows Need for Abstinence Education, Says Family Research Council”)


Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.

Comments

By: Curt Prins | March 25, 2008 at 12:57 am

Hmm…nice attempt at spinning the issue. Might you consider that your hallowed Abstinence only education could be one of the sources of this problem?

By: Pat | March 27, 2008 at 1:08 pm

Abstinence only could never be a source of the problem, since abstinence (100 % guaranteed) would prevent the spread of diseases. STD’s are Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Why wouldn’t you want to give abstinence education a chance?

By: nigel | March 30, 2008 at 11:25 am

Abstinence only may be 100% effective, but that different from claiming abstinence only education is 100% effective.
Abstinence only education is only effective if those that were taught that method don’t have sex. So where do you go if those taught abstinence only decide to ignore the teachings and have sex?

The same goes with teaching about condoms. It’s only effective if those that were taught about condoms actually use them if they decide to have sex.

We can preach and teach all we want. Ultimately the end result is beyond our control.

I wonder what the percentage of these teens with STDs actually had unprotected sex as opposed to condom protected sex.
Chances are the infected teens didn’t use condoms.