FRC Action, the legislative action arm of Family Research Council, has released the results of a commissioned national survey showing that a clear majority of voters would be less likely to support a candidate who proposes a national health care plan that includes universal abortion coverage. The scientific survey by Wilson Research Strategies asked the following question of 801 likely voters: If a candidate for the Presidency proposed a national health care plan with universal coverage of abortion at taxpayer expense, would you be more or less likely to vote for that candidate?

A clear majority of voters (56%) signaled that they would be less likely to vote for a presidential candidate proposing universal abortion coverage compared to (31%) who would be more likely to support such a candidate. Intensity runs strongest among those opposed to the idea, with 45% indicating they would be much less likely to vote in favor of a candidate whose plan forced taxpayers to pay for abortion, compared to 19% who would be much more likely to endorse such a candidate. Opposition to universal abortion coverage crossed nearly every demographic including sex, race, region, and age.

Some of the polls most interesting findings include the following:

  • Independent voters of all ages and sex would be less likely to vote for a candidate that proposed a national health care plan with universal coverage of abortion at taxpayer expense.
  • Although a majority of Democrats would support a candidate that proposed a national health care plan with universal coverage of abortion at taxpayer expense, the support is soft at best (51%).
  • Resistance to abortion coverage is consistent between both sexes and all ages. Women aged 55 or older are the most opposed to such coverage (59% are less likely to vote for a candidate endorsing it), men of all ages follow in opposition (57% less likely to vote for a candidate endorsing it), and the majority of (51%) of women aged 18-54 are less likely to support such a candidates.
  • Widespread disapproval of candidates who support taxpayer-funded abortion coverage spans all but one region of the United States New England.

Files Available for Download [PDF]