<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spinning Research 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2007/10/spinning-research-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/10/spinning-research-101/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:09:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/10/spinning-research-101/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=360#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Nice pointing out of the FRCs previous statistical abuses. My blog has quite a number too - I find the FRC has a very poor record on statistical matters.

Pat: Who is not &#039;telling the truth&#039;? The dangers of STDs are already well publicised. All sex-ed programs cover them, both comprehensive and abstinance-only. The problem here is that a significent number of people, fully aware of the dangers, go ahead with casual unprotected sex regardless.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice pointing out of the FRCs previous statistical abuses. My blog has quite a number too &#8211; I find the FRC has a very poor record on statistical matters.</p>
<p>Pat: Who is not &#8216;telling the truth&#8217;? The dangers of STDs are already well publicised. All sex-ed programs cover them, both comprehensive and abstinance-only. The problem here is that a significent number of people, fully aware of the dangers, go ahead with casual unprotected sex regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/10/spinning-research-101/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=360#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Why should the multitude pay for the sins of a few. The liberals have always given them excuses for their behavior or they have a &quot;right&quot; to behave in dangerous behaviors. Why is it, they are always crying to the rest of us that these problems are ours and we should pay for it
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should the multitude pay for the sins of a few. The liberals have always given them excuses for their behavior or they have a &#8220;right&#8221; to behave in dangerous behaviors. Why is it, they are always crying to the rest of us that these problems are ours and we should pay for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick (gryph)</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/10/spinning-research-101/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick (gryph)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=360#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Your post is titled &quot;Spinning Research 101&quot;.

I guess you graduated from class requirement &quot;Spinning Research 100&quot; with flying colors, as demonstrated by yours and Tony&#039;s claims on CNBC in October 2006 and in Perkins web post &quot;The Politically Incorrect Truth&quot;.

FRC claimed:  &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;…the Journal of Sex &amp; Marital Therapy found that boys molested by men are almost four times more likely to become homosexual or bisexual than boys who weren’t molested.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course, you guys left out the fact that the study was based on only 35 men. Yup. 35. Pitiful.


For a refresher course, read Boxturtlebulletin&#039;s succinct account of yours and Tony&#039;s rather smarmy misuse of statistics on sexual behavior.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/10/08/105&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/10/08/105&lt;/a&gt;

Not to mention  his update on the issue.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/10/20/116&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/10/20/116&lt;/a&gt;

Perhaps I&#039;m not &quot;culturally sensitive&quot; enough, but when did it become morally acceptable for so-called Christian political organizations to misrepresent the truth and outright lie?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post is titled &#8220;Spinning Research 101&#8243;.</p>
<p>I guess you graduated from class requirement &#8220;Spinning Research 100&#8243; with flying colors, as demonstrated by yours and Tony&#8217;s claims on CNBC in October 2006 and in Perkins web post &#8220;The Politically Incorrect Truth&#8221;.</p>
<p>FRC claimed:<br />
<blockquote><em>…the Journal of Sex &#038; Marital Therapy found that boys molested by men are almost four times more likely to become homosexual or bisexual than boys who weren’t molested.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, you guys left out the fact that the study was based on only 35 men. Yup. 35. Pitiful.</p>
<p>For a refresher course, read Boxturtlebulletin&#8217;s succinct account of yours and Tony&#8217;s rather smarmy misuse of statistics on sexual behavior.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/10/08/105" rel="nofollow">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/10/08/105</a></p>
<p>Not to mention  his update on the issue.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/10/20/116" rel="nofollow">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/10/20/116</a></p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m not &#8220;culturally sensitive&#8221; enough, but when did it become morally acceptable for so-called Christian political organizations to misrepresent the truth and outright lie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/10/spinning-research-101/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=360#comment-764</guid>
		<description>What I can&#039;t understand is why is telling anyone who is in danger of getting a deadly disease a sensitive issue. What&#039;s wrong with the plan old truth.  Why is it that the public becomes responsible for the unhealthy behaviors of a group of irresponsible individuals who should know better but apparently don&#039;t care.  I do believe that truth in education is more important than trying to solve the problem created by not telling the truth about sexual behaviors that can lead to STD&#039;s.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I can&#8217;t understand is why is telling anyone who is in danger of getting a deadly disease a sensitive issue. What&#8217;s wrong with the plan old truth.  Why is it that the public becomes responsible for the unhealthy behaviors of a group of irresponsible individuals who should know better but apparently don&#8217;t care.  I do believe that truth in education is more important than trying to solve the problem created by not telling the truth about sexual behaviors that can lead to STD&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/10/spinning-research-101/comment-page-1/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=360#comment-763</guid>
		<description>Because your values are outdated, originating in a time long before contraception when sex and reproduction were inseperably linked. Times change. It just takes a while for some people to catch up.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because your values are outdated, originating in a time long before contraception when sex and reproduction were inseperably linked. Times change. It just takes a while for some people to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
