<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Blocks Opening of New Ill. Planned Parenthood Clinic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2007/09/judge-blocks-opening-of-new-ill-planned-parenthood-clinic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/09/judge-blocks-opening-of-new-ill-planned-parenthood-clinic/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:09:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/09/judge-blocks-opening-of-new-ill-planned-parenthood-clinic/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=338#comment-602</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s OK for gays and lesbians to jeer and make remarks to heterosexuals. It&#039;s OK for war protestors to destroy government property.  I thought Planned Parenthood was bigger and bolder than to hide behind a scheme to cover up their building of such a huge center.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s OK for gays and lesbians to jeer and make remarks to heterosexuals. It&#8217;s OK for war protestors to destroy government property.  I thought Planned Parenthood was bigger and bolder than to hide behind a scheme to cover up their building of such a huge center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jillstanek.com</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/09/judge-blocks-opening-of-new-ill-planned-parenthood-clinic/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>jillstanek.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=338#comment-603</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;(Proliferations) special: Planned Parenthood Aurora&lt;/strong&gt;

Today I&#039;d like to draw attention to pro-life blogs that have been covering the Aurora Planned Parenthood scandal. As part of the new media, blogs help counter the old media, which long ago began and persist to this day in...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(Proliferations) special: Planned Parenthood Aurora</strong></p>
<p>Today I&#8217;d like to draw attention to pro-life blogs that have been covering the Aurora Planned Parenthood scandal. As part of the new media, blogs help counter the old media, which long ago began and persist to this day in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/09/judge-blocks-opening-of-new-ill-planned-parenthood-clinic/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=338#comment-601</guid>
		<description>Questionable, but not quite illegal. There have been incidents before where construction of new clinics has proven impossible because of pro-life campaigns directed at the contruction contractors. No violent incidents of which I am aware, but a few threats of violence, and a lot of contacting the contractor&#039;s other clients and asking them to stop payment. Its very bad for business.

There is a difference between a protest that merely protests, and one that is intended to actively obstruct someone performing a legal action. The latter is taking the law into the hands of someone who shouldn&#039;t have it: It is not the place of protestors to decide what may or may not be built.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Questionable, but not quite illegal. There have been incidents before where construction of new clinics has proven impossible because of pro-life campaigns directed at the contruction contractors. No violent incidents of which I am aware, but a few threats of violence, and a lot of contacting the contractor&#8217;s other clients and asking them to stop payment. Its very bad for business.</p>
<p>There is a difference between a protest that merely protests, and one that is intended to actively obstruct someone performing a legal action. The latter is taking the law into the hands of someone who shouldn&#8217;t have it: It is not the place of protestors to decide what may or may not be built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/09/judge-blocks-opening-of-new-ill-planned-parenthood-clinic/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=338#comment-600</guid>
		<description>SO IT&#039;S OK TO SNEAK AROUND TO AVOID CONTRUCTIVE OBJECTIONS TO THE PROJECT???
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO IT&#8217;S OK TO SNEAK AROUND TO AVOID CONTRUCTIVE OBJECTIONS TO THE PROJECT???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/09/judge-blocks-opening-of-new-ill-planned-parenthood-clinic/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=338#comment-599</guid>
		<description>PP&#039;s official excuse for the sneakyness is that they were trying to avoid disruptive action by pro-life campaigners. Partially to avoid protests, partially because they were worried that the protestors would either intimidate the construction workers or block access to the site.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PP&#8217;s official excuse for the sneakyness is that they were trying to avoid disruptive action by pro-life campaigners. Partially to avoid protests, partially because they were worried that the protestors would either intimidate the construction workers or block access to the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/09/judge-blocks-opening-of-new-ill-planned-parenthood-clinic/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=338#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Why in the world does Planned Parenthood have to sneak around and do thing illegally?  I have a pretty good idea.  Why did Adam and Eve cover themselves?  No one told them to be ashamed.  Was it because they had a conscience that told them they disobeyed God. So has Planned Parenthood something to hide?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why in the world does Planned Parenthood have to sneak around and do thing illegally?  I have a pretty good idea.  Why did Adam and Eve cover themselves?  No one told them to be ashamed.  Was it because they had a conscience that told them they disobeyed God. So has Planned Parenthood something to hide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
