Faith and Science in the Global Warming Debate
by Joe Carter
May 31, 2007
FRC hosted a policy discussion on global warming with panelists Dr. E. Calvin Beisner, Dr. Kenneth Chilton, Dr. Jim Ball, and Dr. Lowell Pritchard. Ball and Pritchard are associated with the Evangelical Environmental Network and advocate a strong response to human-caused climate change. Beisner is at Interfaith Stewardship Alliance. He and Chilton advocate environmental stewardship that avoids significant economic impacts on the poor, and crafted a rebuttal to EEN’s “Urgent Call to Action” on climate change.
Don Bosch of The Evangelical Ecologist live-blogged the event and had a number of interesting comments, including:
I thought the discussion was very civil, at least what I caught of it. Happy about the concensus that climate change must not be an issue that divides the Church. Debating the issue is good, and we may have different ideas about how to deal with climate change (human-caused, naturally-occurring, or some combination), but that shouldn’t divide the family of God.
Click here to listen to the audio online.
Family Research Council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization. If this post has been helpful to you, please consider a gift to help us continue to advance Faith, Family, and Freedom.
Comments
Actually, the FRC is only interested in ensuring no action is taken.
I recall them refering to climate change as ‘anti-american science’ in a part article.
Its just a political problem. The FRC has chosen to support the Republican party. They dont want to draw any attention to climate change, because doing so might nudge people towards the Democrats.
Way to back up your accusation with facts Mr. Raven (or is that raving?)
Awful sneaky of FRC to not draw attention to an issue by having a public discussion about it and invite both sides. What will they think of next?

By: Don | May 31, 2007 at 9:15 pm
Terrific to see FRC taking on issues like this.