<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FRC Responds to Supreme Court Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2007/04/frc-responds-to-supreme-court-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/04/frc-responds-to-supreme-court-decision/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Carey</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/04/frc-responds-to-supreme-court-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=238#comment-355</guid>
		<description>Tony,
I find it sad that you think that this supreme court ruling is good.

&quot;&quot;We applaud the Court for recognizing the legitimate interest that Congress has &#039;in ensuring so grave a choice is well informed.&#039; &quot;

This comment is particularly scary as you have a large bully pulpit and with comments like this you are misleading pro-lifers.
Legitimate interest that &quot;ensuring so grave a choice is well informed.&quot; This ban will not SAVE ONE CHILDS LIFE! it does nothing it is a false hollow victory for some who love the process and the battle to pat themselves on the back.  All that will happen the abortion doctor will kill the child in a different way. This law doesn&#039;t up hold the child&#039;s innate right to life nor will it save ONE CHILD&quot;S life.

You by thanking &quot;&quot;I want to thank President Bush, Congressman Steve Chabot (R-OH), and former Senator Rick Santorum for all their hard work over the years to pass this legislation.&quot;&quot;
Help to deceive the naive people into believing that these men are pro-life and that they care about the lives of children. They don&#039;t and the supreme court only up held the ban on this specific procedure because it didn&#039;t put an undo burden on the woman&#039;s right to have an abortion since they can kill the child by another method.

You support such and evil ruling and taught it as a victory for pro-lifers sad so sad but from what I have heard in the washington watch radio program you have been infected by the yeast of washington (the process).

Until you change your strategy you will not help the pro-life movement but only handicap it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,<br />
I find it sad that you think that this supreme court ruling is good.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;We applaud the Court for recognizing the legitimate interest that Congress has &#8216;in ensuring so grave a choice is well informed.&#8217; &#8221;</p>
<p>This comment is particularly scary as you have a large bully pulpit and with comments like this you are misleading pro-lifers.<br />
Legitimate interest that &#8220;ensuring so grave a choice is well informed.&#8221; This ban will not SAVE ONE CHILDS LIFE! it does nothing it is a false hollow victory for some who love the process and the battle to pat themselves on the back.  All that will happen the abortion doctor will kill the child in a different way. This law doesn&#8217;t up hold the child&#8217;s innate right to life nor will it save ONE CHILD&#8221;S life.</p>
<p>You by thanking &#8220;&#8221;I want to thank President Bush, Congressman Steve Chabot (R-OH), and former Senator Rick Santorum for all their hard work over the years to pass this legislation.&#8221;"<br />
Help to deceive the naive people into believing that these men are pro-life and that they care about the lives of children. They don&#8217;t and the supreme court only up held the ban on this specific procedure because it didn&#8217;t put an undo burden on the woman&#8217;s right to have an abortion since they can kill the child by another method.</p>
<p>You support such and evil ruling and taught it as a victory for pro-lifers sad so sad but from what I have heard in the washington watch radio program you have been infected by the yeast of washington (the process).</p>
<p>Until you change your strategy you will not help the pro-life movement but only handicap it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

