<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government Agencies Caught In The Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frcblog.com/2007/02/government-agencies-caught-in-the-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/02/government-agencies-caught-in-the-act/</link>
	<description>The Blog of Family Research Council</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/02/government-agencies-caught-in-the-act/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=105#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Political funding always comes with political pressure. But if art cant be offensive, it ceases to be art - it becomes kitsch. An endless repetition of the same ideas, as noone dares to try new things.

Im not sure if this film was mostly art or mostly documentory. Either way, I suspect it might be using the old trick of stiring up sone contriversy to create attention.

I am also quite confident that the FRC would have no objections at all if the government were spending its money to finance a film reflecting conservative views :&gt; Everyone likes a good excuse to point to someone else as corrupted and dirty while polishing their own armor.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political funding always comes with political pressure. But if art cant be offensive, it ceases to be art &#8211; it becomes kitsch. An endless repetition of the same ideas, as noone dares to try new things.</p>
<p>Im not sure if this film was mostly art or mostly documentory. Either way, I suspect it might be using the old trick of stiring up sone contriversy to create attention.</p>
<p>I am also quite confident that the FRC would have no objections at all if the government were spending its money to finance a film reflecting conservative views :> Everyone likes a good excuse to point to someone else as corrupted and dirty while polishing their own armor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.frcblog.com/2007/02/government-agencies-caught-in-the-act/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.frcblog.agathongroup.com/?p=105#comment-135</guid>
		<description>When it comes to art, there will always be someone offended.  We need somehow to get the governmant out of the business of lending any finacial support to independent filmmakers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to art, there will always be someone offended.  We need somehow to get the governmant out of the business of lending any finacial support to independent filmmakers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

